GOP:when Bush lies to public...why move over to Clinton?

Question

Yes, yes, we hear about what Clinton DID...but isn't this just a neat, clever trick to shift resonsibility from one who has no accountability to one who already paid the price for his mistakes?

Can you give us something MORE on why Gonzales can't tell the truth...Libby...VP...Bush?
Or is it American's don't want the truth?

Answer 1

Its called character assassination, it has worked for them before. Remember the "Swift Boat Veterans." I just remember what is an old saying. Clinton lied and nobody died.

Answer 2

I am so sick of them do the blame shift game.
No one held a gun to Bush's head for him to do the following:
Bush said
"Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent.”

State of the Union Address – 1/28/2003

Not True
Zero Viable Chemical Weapons Found
Not a drop of any viable chemical weapons has been found anywhere in Iraq. We found shells of old sarin gas that had been used in the Iran/Iraq war of the 1980's.

The U.S. military announced in 2004 in Iraq that several crates of the old shells had been uncovered and that they contained a blister agent that was no longer active.

Bush said:
“We have also discovered through intelligence
that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to disperse chemical or biological weapons across broad areas."

State of the Union Address – 1/28/2003

Not True

Zero Aerial Vehicles Found
Not a single aerial vehicle capable of dispersing chemical or biological weapons, has been found anywhere in Iraq

Bush said:
"Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at past nuclear sites."

Bush speech to the nation – 10/7/2002

Not True

Two months of inspections at these former Iraqi nuclear sites found zero evidence of prohibited nuclear activities there

IAEA report to UN Security Council – 1/27/2003

Bush said:
"We gave him a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn't let them in."

Bush Press Conference 7/14/2003

Not True

UN inspectors went into Iraq to search for possible weapons violations from December 2002 into March 2003

One of the biggest whoppers: Iraq could launch an attack in 45 minutes.

On September 26, 2002, President Bush repeated a claim put forth by British intelligence that "the Iraqi regime could launch a biological or chemical attack in as little as 45 minutes after the order were given." On September 28, he again made the claim in his weekly radio address.

Not true

NO aerial vehicles could be found to substantiate that claim. I know some idiot is going to say, "Well they got moved into Syria" They need to ask themselves this question. IF we were able to see this on satellite and through " intelligence" why is it we did not spot such huge vehicles being moved? We didn't because they did not exist.
So what more did he need to articulate effectively for people to start drinking the koolaid again?

but by far the best of them is:-

September 17,2001
QUESTION: Do you want bin Laden dead?

BUSH: I want justice. And there's an old poster out west, that I recall, that said, ``Wanted, Dead or Alive.''

6 months later

Q Mr. President, in your speeches now you rarely talk or mention Osama bin Laden. Why is that? Also, can you tell the American people if you have any more information, if you know if he is dead or alive?
THE PRESIDENT: Deep in my heart I know the man is on the run,.......So I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that much time on him, Kelly, to be honest with you.

None of the above words were issued from Clinton's mouth but as usual everything is his fault, Bush never has any responsibility. No wonder he thinks he can continue to run rough shod over the Congress and the checks and balances built into the Constitution

Answer 3

None of them have lied. You cant cite ne lie except for Clinton.

Answer 4

I don't think bush has lied.

You are trying to criminalize policy it's a typical lib tactic. Stalin and the rest of the lib icons did it too.

Answer 5

well if you can point out any lies Bush told

Answer 6

You have yet to prove they lied. When did they change the burden of proof statute?