English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

all the people in my community highly support this idea because we all know hillary has white house experience. with you as the vice pres. you can soak up the political experiance.
i beleive in you as pres. and aswell as hillary. but why argue about politics and policies, let's work together to accomplish one common goal! do know that for the next 16yrs, the citizens of the u.s.could accualy have there voice heard! that's alot of time and i'm sure that other counties in the world would welcome this plan. for a minute, disregard democrates an republicans and do something that hase'nt been done in a long time, work for the betterment of the citizens! nobody trust the govt. so i think that if you and hillary get together with both of yall on the democratic ticket, i think that you will see a landslide in votes with never before heard of voter turn out...
thanx for ya time. mike h.

2007-03-30 10:08:32 · 8 answers · asked by MIKE M 1 in Politics & Government Elections

8 answers

You are correct in Hillary has White House experience, but I do not think your idea will work. She will work with all citizens to accomplish common goals and is ready to serve.

2007-03-30 13:23:30 · answer #1 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0 1

I don't trust Hillary Clinton at all. She just wants power. It's all she's ever wanted. Why did she move to New York to be a Senator? Was she from New York? Did she care deeply about New York?

No, she did it so she could win power in a powerful state. She did it for HERSELF.

She'd also try to disarm the nation. No thanks, I'll keep my guns. I don't trust some whacko politician with my freedom, I'll ensure it myself.

We also don't need a Presidential history that reads Bush Clinton Clinton Bush Bush Clinton. What the hell is going on, did we suddenly become a country with two royal families?

2007-03-30 10:19:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The single worst possible choice for any position of responsibility in government would be Hillary Clinton. Bush ain't much but compared to that loony tune he's fantastic. I wouldn't trust my pets alone with either Clinton on a bet much less allow them access to the White House again.

2007-03-30 10:19:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No thanks.

White house experience? The White House groundskeepers have experience there but you don't see them running.

By the way, what IS the one common goal? If our voices aren't heard now what makes you think that our voices will be heard under Hitlery and First Lady Bill's regime?

Hitlery is a LIAR. HYPOCRITE! FRAUD! See through her condescending tones for the fake she REALLY is.

Since when has the world been divided up into COUNTIES?

We need to end this 'Bush/Clinton' dynasty.

2007-03-30 14:48:58 · answer #4 · answered by Tiberius 4 · 1 0

um, neither Hillary NOR Barak would ever accept less than the top spot

2007-03-30 10:14:05 · answer #5 · answered by kapute2 5 · 1 0

The Clintons are liars and thieves. Why would I vote for her?

2007-03-30 11:50:57 · answer #6 · answered by Starla_C 7 · 2 0

i wouldnt wipe my butt with a ballot cast for hillary...pure socialist...

2007-03-30 10:11:27 · answer #7 · answered by badjanssen 5 · 2 0

HUH???

2007-03-30 10:11:58 · answer #8 · answered by wondering 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers