No. George W Bush has the wisdom and lead our nation and fight a war. Your problem is that your left wing wackos friends are cheering the enemy and hoping that Bush fails.
2007-03-30 09:17:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by c1523456 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
We should have started fighting in unity from 9/11 onwards. Non-partisan across the board. And that would mean bringing in flakes like Ralph Nader. This is like WWII and everybody and everything needs to be focused on winning this. That means war bonds, parties to support the troops, production turned to winning. Things are that bad my friends.
2007-03-30 16:08:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bob M 1
·
5⤊
0⤋
No. I think he is a pretty smart guy although not the smartest. The fact is that if 9/11 had occurred during a Democrat administration we would have gone to war. The resolution to go to war was bi-partisan. The war would have largely been fought the same way. The problem is that the US underestimated the strength of the insurgency.
2007-03-30 16:12:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Some people lack the neccessary wisdom to talk & ask questions. He seems to be doing as well as can be done under these circumstances. When in country fighting breaks out, it is hard to control.
2007-03-30 16:16:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
No. For a war as hard as this one is, he's doing a fine job. This is a war on terror, not just a war in Iraq. He said it was going to be difficult, since he made his first speech after 9/11, when he made the declaration of war on terrorism. Weren't you listening?
2007-03-30 16:12:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
NO! Congress lacks the necessary intestinal fortitude to lead a nation and fight a war.
2007-03-30 16:16:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Open Your Eyes 1
·
2⤊
3⤋
Bush lacks the wisdom and vision required to successfully lead a gang of drunken frat boys into a wh*re house.
2007-03-30 16:14:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by qwiff_hunter 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
Its a little late to be asking these questions, he's been in the White House for 6 years.
2007-03-30 16:15:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well how many presidents were military commanders?
I do thing that some of his advisors have given him bad information on plenty of occasions and sometimes he has chosen to replace those people but other times he hasnt when he should have.
2007-03-30 16:18:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by sociald 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
GW Bush barely has the necessary wisdom to tie his shoes and wave bye-bye.
2007-03-30 22:58:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by tehabwa 7
·
0⤊
4⤋