He does it for the money.
2007-03-30 08:57:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Feeling Mutual 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Emboldening huh? I think Clinton did the emboldening of Al Qaeda by doing NOTHING about the terror attacks on our soldier's on the USS Cole in Yemen, US embassy in Africa, and Somalia. Rush Limbaugh was just reporting the truth on what an IDIOT Clinton is, and was. He is a commentator after all, and I'll bet you terrorist factions like Al Qaeda, get most of their information about the president, by what the president does, than by listening to Rush Limbaugh on talk radio.
2007-03-30 16:04:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are wrong. Clinton and Madeline Halfbright oop Albright did nothing from 1996 - 2000. They ignore the problem. The 1998 incident was a weak reesponse.
2007-03-30 15:59:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by c1523456 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
He didnt really need to Chi, Clinton had no plan on doing a damn thing about alqaeda.
Clintons lack of action was emboldening enough. There was nothing to undermine as far as that stuff went.
2007-03-30 15:58:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by sociald 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ratings
2007-03-30 15:57:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by mymadsky 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Because he's a big, fat liar who makes over 30 mill a year stroking ditto heads who never had an original thought in their empty heads.
2007-03-30 15:57:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
ask mike j fox
ha ha ha h ahh a
2007-03-30 16:03:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by DumbsField o 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL Sorry, Chi, but who really *cares* what he thinks?
I don't.....never once listened to the man.
2007-03-30 15:57:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jadis 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
the easy answer is.......he DIDN'T.
2007-03-30 16:00:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by patriot07 5
·
0⤊
0⤋