False. Chickens aren't mammals, they're birds.
Humans and chickens are ultimately related; birds came from dinosaurs, which came from reptiles. Mammals also came from reptiles.
2007-03-30 08:44:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Doctor 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
All vertebrates are related. However, mammals as a group and birds as a group each descended from different reptile ancestors. Mammals came from the group of sail-backed, 4-legged reptiles that you sometimes see pictured with dinosaurs (like Dimetrodon), and birds descended from the group of dinosaurs known as theropods that includes things like T. Rex and Velociraptor.
Now to answer the question. First, chickens are not mammals, they are birds. Second, humans are mammals, and developed bipedality after evolving from an ape-like ancestor. Our most recent ape ancestors spent most of their time on 4 legs, not 2. Meanwhile, birds are all bipedal because they descended from a bipedal group of dinosaurs. Therefore, bipedality has evolved twice, and does not exist in the two groups because they shared a common ancestor.
2007-03-30 08:46:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Fuller 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They certainly are related, but it won't be by a common mammal ancestor. I would guess that the common ancestor is a pre-dinosaur reptile.
To get our common ancestor you have to bo farther back than mammals, because it is likely that birds evolved from dinosaurs, and mammals already existed at that point. So unless dinosaurs also evolved from mammals, there cannot be a common mammal ancestor. Much more likely that the common ancestor is a species of reptile that evolved into both mammals and dinosaurs---birds.
2007-03-30 08:47:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This specific question is false.
Chickens and humans are related by evolution, but not in the way described. Chickens did not have a mammal ancestor.
2007-03-30 08:54:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Joan H 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
some might argue Evolution is a reality, others would possibly no longer. whether the element approximately dinosaurs and chickens or people and monkeys its purely finding on the DNA. Its asserting that between all residing creatures this different creature could be the closest. that would not unavoidably mean that evolution occurs or denies it, purely says 'howdy look, its comparable, its a hazard". shop that throughout the time of recommendations, its a working theory and thats what they are basing it off of. I mean i'm effective you get genetics and which you may look like your mothers and fathers thats precisely what they try to coach. i do no longer think of you will desire to disclaim nor settle for it. nevertheless a artwork in progression. A childs DNA would be a mix of mums and dads suited, yet no longer good. Thats precisely what they try to artwork on. you need no longer say something undesirable approximately Darwin, his ideals or something. Its an idealism, you have your person so enable human beings have their very own.
2016-10-01 22:59:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by carol 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to the current paradigm virtually all living organisms are "related"; however, to suggest that the bipedalism of human beings and that of birds is the result of a common ancestor is false.
2007-03-30 08:50:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by billy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The answer you are looking for is most likely no. Why? A chicken is a bird (avian) and a human is an ape (mammal). However, it could be argued that we are VERY distantly related, because we share (as do all organisms) the same four nucleic base pairs: Adenine, Guanine, Cytosine, and Thymine.
2007-03-30 08:44:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by barracudamagoo 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
false.
Chickens and humans both had a common tetrapod ancestor. They both had very early archosaurs as ancestors. But archosaurs diverged into many lines, one of which became synapsid reptiles and then mammals. A seperate line became early squamate reptiles, then dinosaurs then birds. Mammals are not in the same line as birds.
2007-03-30 09:07:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dendronbat Crocoduck 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chickens and humans are related since they are members of the same kingdom and phylum; however, after that they are members of different classes, orders, families, etc.
They are both warmblooded vertebrates, that's about it.
2007-03-30 09:00:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by michelle 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
False
development of species goes from undeveloped to developed creaters. (according to the evolution theory of darwin) A mamal is considered the most developed. A chicken is OBVIUSLY no mamal and there by cant have a mamal as ancestor caus than it would be a undevelopment of that specie.
2007-03-30 09:06:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋