-The reason they were voted in to?
-The way Bush will blame the Democrats for his own veto?
Bush's cowardly behavior and self-delusion is gutless.
2007-03-30 08:33:05 · 13 answers · asked by Da Man 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Reality is that the DNC IS in fact, doing the bidding of those that put them in office. For so many to ***** about the Dem Congress wanting to "cut and run" I suggest they should look up the term "majority rules".
I do not support "cut and run", I do not support "status quo"... I support the military response to terrorism in terms of this...You bomb the USA, we will bomb the crap out of your country and LEAVE it in ruins.
2007-03-30 08:40:55 · answer #1 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey Da Loser.....The Democrats haven't done a single thing they promised to do in their first 100 hours, or 100 days. Bush is the commander in chief, congress cannot dictate funding without taking the blame, dont forget you can still override a veto, oooops not enough cut and run libs in Congress for that either.
2007-03-30 15:43:12 · answer #2 · answered by Armed Civilian 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, he'll veto and use the "pork" and "playing politics" excuse. The irony being that record-breaking pork spending occured in 2000-2006, yet Bush lifted his veto stamp only once, in late 2006 (stem cell research). Playing politics is ironic because the whole attorney general scandal is centered around the white house "playing politics." They fired highly competent attorneys who refused to file false charges against Dems. in order to hurt their re-election chances in their district. That's called voter fraud. And then lied to Congress about it.
Everything that comes out of that man's mouth is either a blatant lie or obvious irony.
2007-03-30 15:38:31 · answer #3 · answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush will not let the democrats secure our defeat in Iraq. VETO that Shiiiiiitttttttttt
2007-03-30 15:37:43 · answer #4 · answered by Wizard of Ahhs 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No he will veto the plan because its a stupid plan. Not his fault if the Dem plan of a timetable makes no sense. But i guess thats what ya get.
2007-03-30 15:38:27 · answer #5 · answered by sociald 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How do you draft a war funding bill that mandates a pullout? Seems backwards to me, why do they even draft a war funding bill at all? Is this a joke? Seriously.
If the America population, which is typically overwhelmingly anti-war, always got their war we'd be speaking German now, because they did everything in their power to try to keep us out of WW2. Every war-time president has had low polls and lack of confidence from the people. It's not because the president is bad (although Bush is not the ideal president) but just because that's how popular opinion works. Try to rise above the bias and really see what's going on. This goes deeper than partisan politics.
2007-03-30 15:35:48 · answer #6 · answered by Pfo 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Yes, if by serving their constituencies you mean loading an Iraqi Withdrawal bill with stuff that has nothing to do with an Iraqi withdrawal. Why cant it pass on its own, I wonder?
2007-03-30 15:41:29 · answer #7 · answered by Daniel 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Isn't that what every veto does?
2007-03-30 15:50:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes he will. Excellent point! Bravo!!! Bush has nothing but disdain for the will of the people.
2007-03-30 15:47:07 · answer #9 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
probably
Today I heard him say
"when people side with the lawyers its a sure sign we didn't fir them in a good way" or something
I thought they were Judges, and I thought the question was WHY he fired em.
2007-03-30 15:37:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋