is this proof bush stole both elections?

Question

1. 80% of all votes in America are counted by only two companies: Diebold and ES&S.

2. There is no federal agency with regulatory authority or oversight of the US voting machine industry.

3. The vice-president of Diebold and the president of ES&S are brothers.

4. The chairman and CEO of Diebold is a major Bush campaign organizer and donor who wrote in 2003 that he was "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year."

5. 35% of ES&S is owned by Republican Senator Chuck Hagel, who became Senator based on votes counted by ES&S machines.

6. Republican Senator Chuck Hagel, a long-time friend of the Bush family, was caught lying about his ownership of ES&S by the Senate Ethics Committee.

7. Senator Chuck Hagel was on a short list of George W. Bush's vice- presidential candidates.

8. ES&S is the largest voting machine manufacturer in the US and counts almost 60% of all US votes.

9. Diebold's new touch screen voting machines have no pap

check out link for rest...

http://www.guerrillafunk.com/thoughts/doc000023.html

i like knowing more than you guys, you silly rabbits there was a congressional hearing held last year where it was shown that these two companies can rig any election to come out 51-49, i should i know i'm an assistant to a state senator. keep your foolish ideals of america being the land of the free and the home of the brave alive b/c it's bull. we legislated your civil liberties away w/ the patriot act, and will soon have total control over your lives via homeland security. we can't use armies on our own soil so this is the next best thing, if you want proof look around yur cities, if you live in a major one you should be noticing a lot more 'police' types that aren't official yet but will be soon, wait until we return from easter break, this summer is going to be fun.

Answer 1

You need to learn the difference between "Proof" and "Circumstantial evidence"

Here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_%28law%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumstantial_evidence

If you don't know something, just ask. You don't have to make yourself look ignorant. We don't mind helping.

Answer 2

I don't see any proof here. Voting machines are not
racist as some people have posted. Rediculous. Machines
count the votes, people only post them. Why do you libs
keep hunting up some kind of conspiracies going on?
You all still haven't gotten over getting beat in the past two
elections even tho we had chads and dimples counted
numerous times by both party counters. I have a couple
of real statistics also. 5600 felons voted in Florida, and
1135 felons voted Democratic in North Carolina alone.
Most felons and prisoners are Democrats, Wonder why?

Answer 3

No. When you mature a little, learn about who "owns" companies, that Sen. Hagel thinks GW should be impeached, and that machimes have no political affilliation. Then look at the Democrats in Pennsylvania who turned in voter registration cards from convicted felons in prison, the Daly ballot box stuffing using the names of dead people and realize it's an improvement over the shanannigans that has gone on in the past.

Answer 4

Not by a long shot.

I started laughing at
"80% of all votes in America are counted by only two companies"

and just quit.

This, however, clinches it for me:
"if you live in a major one you should be noticing a lot more 'police' types that aren't official yet but will be soon, wait until we return from easter break, this summer is going to be fun."

Uh huh.

Answer 5

Well, you did not mention Al Gores successful bid to toss thousands of marine ballots because some idiot forgot to put a US post office in the middle of the ocean. This is a fact and until you can explain how this is not trying to steal an election then you are spewing nothing but poopy propaganda!

Answer 6

Ya and Edwards had a brother who once knew a man who lived next to a woman who married the Post Master that once delivered a letter to a man who voted for Gore.

Get on with life

Answer 7

Uh, judging by the fact that Hagel has implied that he would vote to impeach Bush, and opposes his foreign poliy plans, among other things, I doubt points 5-7 really apply...

Answer 8

What incredible proof! A stolen presidential election is no doubt the BIGGEST NEWS STORY OF THE CENTURY.

This proof will make you a millionaire many, many times over because news agencies all over the planet will want to run this story.

Good luck to you sir! Enjoy your new fame and riches!

Answer 9

I voted Kerry, yet i'm a honest-minded individual, and so right this is my take: -the individuals who gained previous due ballots in Ohio weren't all Democrats. For all all of us comprehend, maximum of them (possibly military) might have voted for George W. Bush. -Votes that are thrown out via fact of malfunctioning equipment or via fact they're solid erroneously ought to in no way rely interior the 1st place (examine out the equivalent risk-free practices clause of the 14th substitute). additionally, there is not any inherent link between defective, thrown-out votes and being a Democrat or Republican. returned, for all all of us comprehend the votes have been Republican. Why are all misguided or thrown-out votes Democrat interior the 1st place? and you are going to be able to word this good judgment to Kerry blue states as properly. For all all of us comprehend, Republican votes have been thrown out in many large metropolitan aspects. Why no longer do an diagnosis of those votes- while you're so honest-minded? -What you fail to show is that for the duration of various Kerry states, the vote replaced right into a lot closer than in Ohio (which includes states like Michigan and Pennsylvania). utilising a similar Ohio good judgment (i.e. that an extensive vote necessitates a recount) we ought to consistently have regarded Kerry's wins interior the large Lakes states and Pennsylvania- which accounted for many extra electoral votes than Ohio. Why is it that Democrats tend to think of that a narrow margin is in simple terms "invalid" whilst the Republican wins yet no longer whilst the Democrat wins? perhaps Kerry wouldn't have gained Pennsylvania or Michigan or Wisconsin. -traditionally, there have consistently been irregularities in elections. The previous due Mayor Daley of Chicago is assumed to have thrown out hundreds of Chicago, Illinois votes in the time of the 1960 election. interior the case of Daley's fraud, the documentaive evidence replaced into significant. Kennedy possibly gained, in large diploma, via Daley's shenanigans. How ironic that a Kennedy is scripting this text. till now you leap into the "Bush stole the election" bandwagon, attempt to seem at each and all of the information. attempt to seem on the fact that votes that are thrown out or in no way counted do no longer line up smartly alongside political traces. And if some Republicans did throw out votes, then that could desire to be investigated. yet once you do look into Republican fraud, the actually you need to look into Democrat fraud, exceptionally in states that ended up going to Kerry with a lot narrower margins than Ohio.

Answer 10

for some reason bush has a lot of (republican) supporters who will rip you a new one for questioning their dear leader. fact is more than one agency reported gore as winner then mysteriously bush pulls a coup in florida ad tada he's our new pres. of course he stole it but i wouldn't go as far as to call this proof, more like "does this make it possible he stole the election"