English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why should that have been a factor? Why won't they release them?

2007-03-30 07:37:33 · 16 answers · asked by Surfer Dude 2 in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

To see a real picture of Lindalu click here:

http://mud.mm-a5.yimg.com/image/3381752021

2007-03-30 08:02:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Big Plane, Small Holes
CLAIM: Two holes were visible in the Pentagon immediately after the attack: a 75-ft.-wide entry hole in the building's exterior wall, and a 16-ft.-wide hole in Ring C, the Pentagon's middle ring. Conspiracy theorists claim both holes are far too small to have been made by a Boeing 757. "How does a plane 125 ft. wide and 155 ft. long fit into a hole which is only 16 ft. across?" asks reopen911.org, a Web site "dedicated to discovering the bottom line truth to what really occurred on September 11, 2001."

The truth is of even less importance to French author Thierry Meyssan, whose baseless assertions are fodder for even mainstream European and Middle Eastern media. In his book The Big Lie, Meyssan concludes that the Pentagon was struck by a satellite-guided missile--part of an elaborate U.S. military coup. "This attack," he writes, "could only be committed by United States military personnel against other U.S. military personnel."

FACT: When American Airlines Flight 77 hit the Pentagon's exterior wall, Ring E, it created a hole approximately 75 ft. wide, according to the ASCE Pentagon Building Performance Report. The exterior facade collapsed about 20 minutes after impact, but ASCE based its measurements of the original hole on the number of first-floor support columns that were destroyed or damaged. Computer simulations confirmed the findings.

Why wasn't the hole as wide as a 757's 124-ft.-10-in. wingspan? A crashing jet doesn't punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into a reinforced concrete building, says ASCE team member Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University. In this case, one wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load-bearing columns, explains Sozen, who specializes in the behavior of concrete buildings. What was left of the plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid than a solid mass. "If you expected the entire wing to cut into the building," Sozen tells PM, "it didn't happen."

The tidy hole in Ring C was 12 ft. wide--not 16 ft. ASCE concludes it was made by the jet's landing gear, not by the fuselage.

2007-03-30 07:50:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Who cares? Enough people saw the plane hit.

Again, you have no answer to where the flight 77 crew and passengers are today, if they didn't die in the crash.

I have a former co-worker whose Dad was in the Pentagon that day. And she couldn't get a hold of him. So, she had to sit there at work, in tears, wondering whether her Dad was ok. As it turned out, he was.

Think about the victims rather than your own twisted version of reality for once.

2007-03-30 07:43:16 · answer #3 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 8 0

How many people (if 9/11 was done by our government)would it take to make all the events that day happen? 100? 1000 ? Way to many people would know about it. Someone would talk about it. You couldn't shut all the air traffic controllers up.

2007-03-30 08:00:58 · answer #4 · answered by badcarma98 2 · 4 0

Ahh so you're going to be surfer dude for awhile crypto?

Look why not just admit that we could show you any piece of evidence that would convince a person with an IQ above freezing and you would still insist on your absurd conspiracy theory because you feel persecuted by all around you?

2007-03-30 07:46:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

You,are just the guy I'm looking for. Why not try on one of my deluxe,special tin foil fezzes (made from the finest foil). All your friends will envy you at the Star Trek Conventions as you stroll by wearing the latest in conspiracy wear. They make perfect gifts too.

2007-03-30 07:42:10 · answer #6 · answered by Tin Foil Fez 5 · 8 1

In the words of the great Fred Sanford,"Shuttup ,dummy!"

2007-03-30 07:44:07 · answer #7 · answered by bugeyes 4 · 7 1

To view them for evidence I would imagine. Here's your sign...

WTC Collapse: News prediction (debunks BBC was forewarned theory)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1LetB0z8_o

WTC 7 Fire (debunks no major fire in building)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U

WTC 7 Collapse (debunks entire building magically fell simultaneously)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLHwvwJCmgk

WTC 7 CT Debunked (source)
http://www.debunking911.com/

2007-03-30 07:40:52 · answer #8 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 7 1

Darned. Must be the same conspiracy that caused the WTC buildings to collapse! Are you a bushwhacker?

2007-03-30 07:43:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

It's not the question that they confiscated the videotapes showing 9/11 events, it's "Why haven't they released the ones which back up the 'official' conspiracy theory?" Because we've seen in the past that the government *will* release the type of material which backs up their position; it's difficult to understand why they won't EXCEPT that this material *does NOT* back up their position.

2007-03-30 07:44:05 · answer #10 · answered by comicards 6 · 1 8

fedest.com, questions and answers