English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

My in-laws like to flaunt it. They have Bush/Cheney stickers on their car...and these words actually came out of my sister-in-law's mouth at one of our recent gatherings...
"Some day, people will look back on Bush's presidency and see what a great president he really was." Then she called him a genius......

I married into this family??? OMG!!

2007-03-30 06:55:04 · answer #1 · answered by Nasubi 7 · 3 6

I voted for Bush because I couldnt stand Al Whore or John Skerry.....two of the biggest liars on the planet. If you think things are screwed up now just imagine how pissed off you would be having to learn Arabic and wearing sheets for clothes. A real possibilty had either of those asshats become President.

Dont get me wrong even though I am a Republican I have and will continue to vote for whatever candidate I feel is best for my country no matter what party they represent. There just hasnt been any good Dems and at the rate they are going there wont be any if they keep pushing the Liberal agenda.

2007-03-30 09:15:48 · answer #2 · answered by dave b 6 · 1 0

Your commonly used good-wing talking factor is: "Democrats have been given a similar intelligence and reached a similar end, so blaming Bush for deceptive u.s. is largely political." Then there is using expenditures bearing directly to the possibility posed via Saddam that seems to be from invoice Clinton, John Kerry or another Democrat. the top is that if Bush replaced into mendacity, they should have been mendacity too. there's a pretend assumption underlying this argument, somewhat that Dems gained a similar intel as Bush (they did no longer), yet placing that aside, listed right here are 2 explanation why this might properly be a straw guy: (a) the issue isn't no rely if human beings believed Saddam had WMD (many did), or no rely if there replaced into any information that he had WMD (there replaced into), that's the fact that Bush and his administration made an absolute, unconditional case with the information handy, brooking no dissent and disregarding doubters interior and out of doorways the government as cowardly or treasonous. that's what "manipulating the intelligence" and "deceptive the in many circumstances used public" refers to--the understanding exaggeration of the case for conflict (no rely if via cherry-finding out on intel or utilising defunct intel or via talking approximately ambiguous intel in alarming absolutes). There we've been, extra suitable than a decade after the 1st gulf conflict, 2 years after 9/11, and Saddam hadn’t attacked us, he hadn’t threatened to attack us. and then unexpectedly, he replaced into the biggest threat to u.s.--a raffle that required a large invasion. a much better threat than Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Iran, Bin weighted down. a extensive, on the spot threat. It in simple terms defied perception. (b) as properly to the terror-mongering defined above, the rivalry that Bush 'misled' the in many circumstances used public isn't in simple terms approximately Saddam's WMD, yet bearing directly to the way the administration stormed forward with their plans and invaded Iraq interior the way they did, on the time they did, with the Pollyannaish visions they fed the international, all jointly as demonizing dissent and smearing their critics. In the two (a) and (b), the crux of the issue is proportionality. no rely if or no longer invoice Clinton or France or the U.N. believed Saddam replaced right into a raffle, the administration's apocalyptic words and drastic strikes (preemptively invading a sovereign usa) have been decidedly out of share to the point and immediacy of the possibility. that's the actual subject.

2016-11-25 00:04:08 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I admit that I voted for Bush twice! And I "bump into people" all the time where I live, on an Air Force base, who voted for him as well!
I do not see you fessing up to who you voted for?

2007-03-30 07:01:34 · answer #4 · answered by Serpico 13 3 · 5 2

I used to go out keying expensive cars with Bush bumper stickers on them just for fun on Friday nights. But now I just sit home annoying right-wingers on Answers because not many cars have Bush bumper stickers on them any more. Eventually, even the more stupid members of society begin to come to their senses until only a small spattering of the most incredibly stupid are left behind.

2007-03-30 08:12:37 · answer #5 · answered by Renegade_X 3 · 0 2

I meet people every day. I worked on the last campaign and two of my friends went to the convention, besides protesting at the Dem conference since their fathers were military officers who were offended by Kerry's actions during Vietnam GUESS WHAT MORE PEOPLE VOTED FOR BUSH SO YOU HAVE A BETTER CHANCE OF MEETING US THAN YOUR "FELLOW TRAVELERS".

2007-03-30 07:01:44 · answer #6 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 3 2

Today. I voted for him both times. I also voted for him in the Texas gubernatorial race. I also voted for his father. If he could run again, I would vote for him again.

2007-03-30 09:08:58 · answer #7 · answered by TOMAJE 2 · 1 0

I voted for Bush.

Is that public enough for you?

2007-03-30 06:57:51 · answer #8 · answered by gbravo04 4 · 3 2

I am personally not in favor of Bush. I think he has totally let down the conservatives in this country. I'll tell you though I voted for him because he was the lesser of two evils.

2007-03-30 06:58:38 · answer #9 · answered by Robert and Tanya 2 · 3 3

I didn't vote for him either time, and am proud of it. What a disaster he has been for this country and the world. I'm crossing the days off the calender until we're free of this arrogant, impetuous fool

2007-03-30 07:59:14 · answer #10 · answered by Glenn 2 · 2 2

When I bump into someone, I say "excuse me". I never ask who he or she voted for.

2007-03-30 07:18:23 · answer #11 · answered by spockthevulcan 2 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers