2007-03-30 06:43:40 · 35 answers · asked by ♥Gïrl¥♥ 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
i'll take stitches for $300 please
2007-03-30 06:46:59 · answer #1 · answered by Nash Wolfe 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Stitches.
2007-03-30 07:18:46 · answer #2 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stitches. They're pretty bad but not as bad as a broken bone.
2007-03-30 06:48:08 · answer #3 · answered by icanhelp 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ive never broken a bone (touch wood) but I have had plenty of stitches........so I would go for stitches
2007-03-30 07:07:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Broken bones. I just got stitches about two weeks ago and for the first few days it was burning with pain. It felt like my entire hand was on fire.... not fun at all...
2007-03-30 06:53:10 · answer #5 · answered by Hajime 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely stitches.
2007-03-30 06:45:41 · answer #6 · answered by Devil's lil sister 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Stitches any day. I broke my foot last summer and pretty much couldn't enjoy any summer fun. Plus, I live up two flights of stairs, you get the picture. So, stitches it is!!!
2007-03-30 06:51:14 · answer #7 · answered by Shrew 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think I would prefer stitches - you are not completely incapacitated if you have your leg stitched, you can still walk freely. If you break your leg on the other hand...
2007-03-30 06:48:10 · answer #8 · answered by Christadchick1301 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've had my share of both, thank you. If I had a choice of one or the other again I defiantly go with stitches.
2007-03-30 08:46:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
stitches..i wouldn't want to go through the misery of having a cast put on me or maybe even a surgery done.
2007-03-30 06:47:02 · answer #10 · answered by claria 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Stitches because you would have surgery if ou had a boken bone
2007-03-30 06:46:08 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋