Don't you remember that Dinesh Karthik was the man of the match in the 20-20 match played in South Africa.
In a team every one cannot be a big-hitter.One or two people like them are necessary in the team to steady the innings.Moreover Dravid and Karthick too are capable of scoring quickly when situation warrants,
2007-03-30 23:07:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by karikalan 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Though Dravid was a defensive player couple of years ago, he has proved of late that he can adapt to any situation and score runs at fast rate when situation demands. Hence he can be no more considered as a defensive player. Dinesh Karthik can also be considered as a defensive player. Hence both are suitable for 20/20 cricket as well.
2007-03-30 13:57:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Their strike rate is not good for 20 - 20 world cup. I think India should keep separate team for ODIs and Test Cricket. Moreover the selection should not be on the basis of Domestic Test Cricket career, Indian Cricket board has to find some way to develop the domestic ODs more.
2007-03-30 14:14:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by cuckoo747 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No they should not play in 20-20 cricket in fact some of the players from each team should be given rest.
2007-03-30 23:00:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by DX 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
nice question Anmol.
i think they shouldn't play 20 20
like rahul dravid. mohammed yousuf.etc
2007-03-30 13:41:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by dani 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
is there twenty20 worldcup? if there is one india is better advised to skip it we cannot bear all the built up euphoria before the event and the mighty letdown that inevitably follows it . spare us the agony please
2007-03-30 14:46:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by sagar 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
www.bollystop.com
join for free watch all latest live stream
heilights posted first ever on net
pic & wallpapers diccussion much more
www.bollystop.com
2007-03-30 16:50:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course not
2007-03-31 05:32:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2007-03-31 01:34:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by john 7
·
0⤊
0⤋