Why didnt the plane crash with the New York Baseball player, drop the building in 56 mins, like 9/11??

Question

jet fuel perhaps BUSH PPL..

757... that low?? hmmm.... no windows... 9 of the 15 terrorist still alive.... old *** Osama Bin Laden named responsible.... over 80% of the employees in the buildings... not at work that day.... NYFD with a completely diff. take on the story.... numerous survivors reporting other explosions going off b4 either plane hit... WOW... get your research up u Dickbush!!

Answer 1

Nine hijackers were not found alive. BBC reported case of stolen identity which made it appear some of hijackers are 'alive' because they used someone elses' ID.

The article is titled "Hijack 'suspects' found alive and well". So lot of people don't even read the article and claim hijackers are alive when the article is really about case of stolen identity. That's why BBC put quotation mark around 'suspects.'

They didn't find actual suspects, but they found people whose identification matches that of hijackers.

Article titles are attention grabber and always don't tell the entire story. You have to read the whole thing.

If they steal your ID and blow up buildings do you go to jail?

If they steal your credit card and spend thousands do you take the responsibility?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm

Your research stinks more than Rosie's toilet.

Answer 2

Conspiracy theories don't like the light of reality.

It's a simple matter of physics and substandard building engineering.

Pick up a small rock. Notice how much it weighs. Throw it against something like a wall.

The mass of the rock plus the speed your pitch generated didn't do much to that target you hit.

Now, increase the mass of the object. Add combustible liquids and increase the speed by ten fold.

The fastest the small single engine aircraft that hit the apartment building was barely 120 miles an hour and the plane weighed under 4000 pounds, fully loaded.

I forget the numbers for a Boeing 757, but it's a whole lot bigger and they were going a whole lot faster when they hit the Trade Towers.

Oh, and the Trade Towers were a compromised design, created to maximize floor space with a design that was not meant to survive that amount of deliberate damage.

Rumors do nothing but hurt the living. Stop promoting half truths.

Answer 3

Maybe because a Honda Civic weighs more than the plane carrying the baseball player. Maybe because the plane carrying the baseball player was only going about 120 mph and not 500 mph like the jets on 9/11. Maybe because the plane carrying the baseball player was a propeller plane and not a jet and doesn't use jet fuel.

Answer 4

apples and oranges the players plane was a single engine prop plane 2000 lbs total running on gasoline you dummy.
verses a 757.... why am i waisting my time?

Answer 5

An entire Cessna, fully loaded with fuel, weighs less than the fuel in one wing of a 757.

Answer 6

Your ignorance is topped only by your insensitivity.

You are dealing with the deaths of real people here. Lots of people. People with families, plans and dreams.

If you're so desperate for entertainment, go back and play with your Naruto action figures. Let the dead rest in peace.

Answer 7

Nothing 4 nothing , but I dont believe the governments story on 9/11. But this argument is invalid and irrelevant. You must be kidding

Answer 8

Because it was a prop job and not a huge jet like a 737.

Answer 9

Because it was a tiny cessna with small amounts of fuel on board?
If you compare that to a 737 with thousands of gallons of fuel and literally hundreds of times bigger.. Seems like it should be obvious.

Answer 10

thousands of gallons of jet fuel vs unleaded--duh