From 1969 to 2000 never was heard of moonlanding as a fake.
Then, people started talking of a fake.
Who sarted this rumour? Why? Why many of us think it might have been a fake?
In my view, there's Fox. There's the mishap. And the fact that guided misinformation opens general debate, while facts are so boring and leave little to be said, except quoting.
Fox started the rumour.
What if Fox turned out to say that that Hoover Dam is a fake too?
Now think: Fox will never open debate on something common people (me an us) can check for.
And by 2001, Fox was somewhat low on audience...
So then, Fox may be blamed for misleading our beliefs on the subject.
But why believe? Why believe when we can pursue knowledge instead?
That's because believing is easier.
Please, check this NASA bit:
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm .
So then, is NASA to be blamed, Fox, or me?
2007-03-30
06:04:58
·
4 answers
·
asked by
fedebicho
3
in
News & Events
➔ Media & Journalism