How did the leaders justify the conflict to their people?
How essential is it that leaders justify war?
Did the justification change depending on audience?
(i.e. constituents,allies,neutral parties,opponents).If so how?
Did the justification change over time?If so how?
Did the intended audience accept the justification?This can
be judged by examining newspaper columns and editorials, statements by governments & polls.
What determines when the point of last retort is reached?
How does the conflict support the principles & categories of war?
Does the conflict lend itself to other principles or categories of war?
Do you agree w/ the principles & categories of war?
Please answer question w/ much details and evidence
Thank you
2007-03-30 06:02:11 · 5 answers · asked by mundoskisis4life 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
start search from here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War#Background
2007-03-30 06:07:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Vietnam Conflict, actually it was never declared a war by Congress, was all about stopping Communism. Our goal was to stop the spread of communism throughtout Asia. The problem the US government ran across was here in this country. Many, right or wrong, claimed that Vietnam had a right to self-determination to decide whether they wanted to be capitalist or communist.
2007-03-30 06:36:49 · answer #2 · answered by mac 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Encyclopedia: a stack of books that contain information on a wide variety of topics, and they are available to use free of charge at most public libraries. It's called home-work. The teacher assigned it because they wanted you to find out the information, not get someone else to do it for you.
2007-03-30 06:06:45 · answer #3 · answered by kc_warpaint 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Do your own homework.
2007-03-30 06:06:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Please do your own research.
2007-03-30 06:09:00 · answer #5 · answered by flieder77 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋