English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

For most all intents & purposes .... NONE.
AMD will give you more bang for the buck.

Beware of biased opinions on this ... although trained to think logically most PC people cast common sense aside when involved in the AMD/Intel debate.

Both make superb processors.
Just look for the best package deal.
Choose at least an AMD X2 4800+ or an Intel E6400 & you won't regret it either way.

regards,
Philip T

2007-03-30 04:21:48 · answer #1 · answered by Philip T 7 · 1 0

Some AMD models are more efficient than comprable Intel chips, and vise versa. Right now Intel's 32bit dual core processors are performing slightly better than AMDs offering, but I think that AMD's 64bit models are doing a little better than Intel. It really goes back and forth and depends on which model of processor you want.

All that aside, if you get an Intel or AMD processor, you have to get a motherboard that is compatible, and, since Intel is bigger, there are more choices in Intel boards than AMD.

2007-03-30 04:26:44 · answer #2 · answered by wax 3 · 0 0

Core 2 duo is the best, phillip has no clue what he is saying. an athlon 64 x2 at $500 will usually perform on par with a $200 core 2 duo. and intel is dropping the prices on april 22nd!

2007-03-31 11:41:56 · answer #3 · answered by scooter 4 · 0 0

E6550. it is going to carry out magnificently and that i talk from adventure. AMD has yet to proper their twin cores to compete with Core2 duo. In twin middle section , C2Duo continues to be the king. yet even with the reality that , you dont opt for that a lot potential in the adventure that your utilising internet or watching video clips, song. the purely reason to get a core2duo is doing such issues as dvd ripping, rendering and as a rule gaming. TAKE AMD, with the money kept get an Ati x2600 professional PCI convey or atleast a 8500 GT. believe me you wont remorseful about it.

2016-12-03 00:47:38 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The difference is mainly bound by your motherboard and socket. Intel has socket 775 for its core duo and extreme multi core systems. it uses a new state of the art refining of the cpu that allows for higher clock speeds without heat build up. AMD is running a little behind on the game. they are using an older refining that maxes out at 3.0ghz stopping the AM2 platform from expanding any further do to heat build up. Aside from that the major difference is the amount of onboard memory each chip has to use known as cache. AMD is maxed out at 2mb (1mb per core) at the moment. Intel has blazzing fast 4mb (2mb per core) wich allows for faster load times and lower latencey between the cpu and the ram. AMD makes up for this with onboard memory controllers wich illiminates the need for the northbridge chipset on the motherboard to handle memory commands, this new method they designed allows for almost instant access to the system ram via the cpu instead of a third party chip. This does have a limitation tho. in old days all you had to do was buy a new motherboard with the same socket type to upgrade to newer types of memory. Now AMD has maid it so that you have to buy a CPU also that supports the memory type you are wanting to upgrade to so you need a new motherboard and CPU. Intel keeps building on there single upgrade principle.
But for the most part they both have there + and - it is up to you to decide what setup will work best for you. I use AMD Myself but i hated having to buy a new motherboard and cpu to upgrade to ddr2 memory. But give it time, AMD is behind on releasing there new toys. So for now Intel has the upper hand. But that can change over night.

2007-03-30 05:19:28 · answer #5 · answered by lostinvamountains 2 · 0 1

amd is better price but intel is better for a fast computer

2007-03-30 06:23:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I totally concur with Phillip

2007-03-30 04:24:19 · answer #7 · answered by Wowwie 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers