The "other" Undertaker was Brian Lee...not Kane.
In 1994, Brian joined the World Wrestling Federation to perform as the Evil Undertaker (sometimes referred to as the "Underfaker"). "The Millon Dollar Man" Ted DiBiase announced to have brought the Undertaker, who had disappeared after the Royal Rumble. This Undertaker, who competed for several weeks, was not "guided by the urn" but by money. Undertaker's manager Paul Bearer however accused DiBiase of lying and claimed that he "had made contact" with the Undertaker. At SummerSlam 1994, Bearer brought back his Undertaker for a match between the two Undertakers. Towards the end of the match DiBiase's Undertaker went for a tombstone pildedriver but it was reversed and then another tombstone was given to make sure DiBiase's Undertaker would not rise.
The real Undertaker would win the match after 3 tombstones
2007-03-30 03:47:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Legna 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
You said it yourself, that encounter a decade ago of Cena shaking Undertaker's hand was pretty significant. Though, that can't certainly be the only reason why the match is "destined" to happen. We all consider Cena as the top guy in the company. That is universally accepted and true. I clearly recognize the guy's uniqueness in the company, being able to handle ANY crowd, and always being able to get a reaction. Undertaker has done that as well. Cena has been here young and strong for a decade, and he really still is aside from minor injuries. The guy is controversially at his prime, some may say years ago, some may say years to come. When any superstar is in such a position, you know he's special. Finally, Cena doesn't lose cleanly. Only rarely. Same applies to Undertaker, especially at WrestleMania, of course. Cena's gimmick is plain and simple- never give up. The classic moral we find in nearly every story, never ever give up. Being applied to the wrestling world of course made it seem idealistic and unreal, in the sense that only superheroes can obtain that gimmick and make it work. Nobody else had this gimmick and been able to work it as finely as Cena. Except for Undertaker. Put these two megastars in the main event at Mania, and you're calling for a very unpredictable anything goes match. This is the one match people are completely scared of, and this is why it must happen. The IWC can ***** all they want about Cena potentially ruining the streak, but that's the whole ******* point. These type of matches are best when nobody but the two wrestlers and Vince know the outcome. Bleacher Report will rehash rumor and speculation articles for months, and not a single one of these articles will provide a solid, definite proof that either one will win. Punk vs Taker was very obvious. This match won't be. Considering also how Undertaker and Cena are the best at "sudden kick outs", this is a match where everybody will be on the edge of their seat. I expect great things from this match which I feel very certain to happen. And if this turns into an I quit match, well, I'll let somebody else explain it since that's a whole another level of surprise.
2016-03-13 23:25:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Brian Lee Undertaker
2016-12-14 03:42:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This Site Might Help You.
RE:
Years ago there was an Undertaker vs Undertaker match? Who was the other Undertaker? Where is he Today?
Does Undertaker have twin or something?
2015-08-16 17:08:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Brian Harris aka Brian Lee played the fake undertaker. Not Kane.
Brian Was "Undertaker #2" in the infamous "Undertaker vs. Undertaker" match at SummerSlam 94', in which he, as Ted DiBiase's fake Undertaker, took on the real Undertaker, Mark Calloway.
Brian was the best man at Mark Calaway's (The Undertaker) wedding
2007-03-30 03:34:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by HULK RULES!! 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/1PDYp
Why is Cena vs Taker important to The Dragon? Simply because Cena is THE face of pro wrestling, it's most recognizable star, the most in-demand performer from pro wrestling and "sports entertainment" wanted for guest appearances by other forms of entertainment (I'm not counting The Rock because he's not a full-time wrestler or full-time member of the WWE; he's an actor who does an occasional match for the WWE, that's all). Cena is this generation's "Hulk Hogan" or "Ric Flair" or "Stone Cold". It absolutely does not matter at all if the IWC "hates" him. The quotation marks are intentional. If those who claim to hate Cena really hated him as much as they claim then they wouldn't watch the WWE nor would they spend so much time and energy blaming Cena for everything wrong in the world. Cena is, without question, the biggest wrestling star in the world of the past ten years. He does it because he loves it and loves the fans. Cena lives to be a WWE "superstar". Lesnar, on the other hand, did it, and does it today, strictly for the money, nothing else. The Undertaker, much like Andre The Giant, has transcended the company he works for. Taker, like Andre, occupies a whole other plane of stardom nobody else does, not even Cena. That's a very apt correlation. If Cena is this generation's Hulk Hogan, then Taker is this generation's Andre The Giant. Hogan and Andre were the two biggest forces of the 80's. Cena and Taker are the biggest forces today. And they certainly define the old saying of "the irresistible force (Cena) meeting the immovable object (Taker)". Their first go-round happened when Cena was basically a rookie trying to make a name for himself. Taker was already established. Cena did well but he was basically just getting started. Taker is past his prime, yes, but still a very dangerous opponent capable of defeating anybody. Cena can be said to be a little past his prime, as well, as injuries have slowed him down a bit. But that doesn't matter. They are still the two biggest forces in the WWE. Still the two guys everybody wants to beat to make names for themselves. Cena is no longer that rookie trying to build a reputation. He's done that already. He IS the biggest star in the business and he's beaten everybody there is to beat in the WWE. Except for The Undertaker. Taker, as well, has beaten everybody. Except for John Cena. A whole lot of fans consider Taker the greatest of all-time. But unless he faces Cena at Wrestlemania that claim isn't valid. They are the two biggest stars in the business. They HAVE to face each other at Wrestlemania. If Cena is the one to end The Streak the WWE will not lose any viewers. Those who obsess over Cena will be back the very next night "hating" him while they watch RAW. The snivelers will be back on the internet blaming Cena for everything wrong in the world, whining about Taker getting "screwed", believing Cena somehow someway manipulated Vince into making Taker lose or some BS. Win lose or draw, doesn't matter, the WWE won't lose any viewers. BQ: Absolutely! The original Four Horsemen are the blueprint, the prototype, the standard, and any other word you may want to use, for the pro wrestling stable. They exemplified what it means to be a TEAM where nobody was more important than anybody else, where the group as a whole had common goals and they all did their parts to achieve those goals, where the group itself was more important than any of it's members. The original Horsemen were a nearly perfect collection of five individuals who became greater as a stable than they were as singles (or tag team) champions. Unless you got to see them in the mid 80's it's hard to describe to somebody who didn't get to see them just how great the group was. There have been some excellent stables since then (the original nWo and DX especially) who got it mostly right but they didn't quite measure up to the standard of excellence that was The Four Horsemen. Ric Flair, Tully Blanchard, Ole and Arn Anderson, JJ Dillon. We'll never see the likes of that again. As the old saying goes, "often imitated but never duplicated".
2016-03-27 04:17:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Brian Lee Wrestler
2016-10-02 23:20:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The guy who played the fake Undertaker, his name is Brian Lee. The guy who plays Kane is Glen Jacobs. Brian Lee is now sporadically appearing at independent events.
2007-03-30 03:17:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by norm2120 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It was the guy who plays Kane. Before that he was fake diesal, Isacc yankem DDS, and the fake undertaker.
Woops sorry, I was wrong. It was brian lee
2007-03-30 03:09:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Relax Guy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ya Kane. I kind of remember that match. My brother use to watch wresting all the time. Anyways i think it was either his brother or his son. Cant remember exactually which.
Coooool i found it for you ! Click below to watch the match!
2007-03-30 03:16:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋