The US has not won anything since WWII, and we will not win this. These conflicts are not orchestrated to be won. but to make those in the Dept of Defense and their war mongering buddies to get rich
2007-03-30 01:04:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Simon M 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The shiites will win with the help of iran. Still, we do not know how that will come to be and how the bigger picture of the middle east will end. The US effort may not go completely without gain depending on how the International community accepts what will happen next.
Clearly the Coalition forces are making serious positive efforts while insurgents are trying to sabotage the effort. This will not go unnoticed, and clearly those who are sabotaging will be named and targeted for blame and not to be trust again.
2007-04-02 17:02:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by ringolarry 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are so many things one could say :
No-one with half a working brain cell could possibly imagine 'winning' in a situation like this.
Didn't your 'President' say that you had 'won' four years ago ?
What makes you think that this isn't exactly the intended result ?
In the end, William Shakespeare got it right in Julius Caesar :
Quote :
A curse shall light upon the limbs of men;
Domestic fury and fierce civil strife shall cumber all the parts of Italy;
Blood and destruction shall be so in use, and dreadful objects so familiar, That mothers shall but smile when they behold Their infants quarter'd with the hands of war;
All pity choked with custom of fell deeds:
And Caesar's spirit, ranging for revenge, With hate by his side come hot from hell, shall in these confines with a monarch's voice Cry "Havoc!" and let slip the dogs of war; That this foul deed shall smell above the earth With carrion men, groaning for burial.
2007-03-30 01:04:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by cosmicvoyager 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wining this war isn't going to be like anything we are familiar with. To walk away saying we won will require a stable, functioning society, which most muslim countries are, only through severe dictatorship. An open and unrepressed society doesn't seem to be their preference. When they aren't killing "non believers" they make war on the different sects within their own culture and faith. I'll pray for your nephews safe return.
2007-03-30 01:16:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Acorn S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
These people think that we can win this war:
The Commander in Chief
The Vice President
Carl Rove
Senator John McCain
Senator Lieberman
Maybe Condi?
2007-03-30 01:03:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by fatsausage 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
in the previous I answer, enable me ideal proper you on one factor. opposite to lefty idealism, there have been certainly WMD's which stated lefties conveniently opt for to miss that their ilk (the Dems) in authorities also believed existed. no longer suggested because of the dicey situation surrounding US/Russia kinfolk became the actual undeniable reality that Iraq stocks a lengthy border with Syria and had a snug relationship going, in which stated WMD's does no longer were difficult to spirit away earlier to the ousting of the single guy usual to have used them. Now, i understand that interior the suitable little international of liberalism the denizens are allowed to imagine in a vacuum at the same time as searching at by a ingesting straw, you'll ask what the hell does that were given to do with issues. properly, no longer some thing formally yet i have been round lengthy sufficient to do not overlook that WMD's do not %. and decide the position they're saved. at the same time as i'm at it, there is yet another factor that needs correcting. those farmers who were killed in Vietnam were squaddies. definite they did not positioned on uniforms and easily farmed and had households yet they were very a lot in contact interior the attempt to protect their u . s .. i understand that theory is alien to lefties yet carry with me. you observe, only because maps teach a border placing apart North from South Vietnam, it does no longer mean that the human eye can distinguish that are South and that are North. Many an American soldier became both killed or completely disabled because they weren't waiting to make out the version (or have any reason to) and were sucker-punched in case you'll. seem up references to little Vietnamese little ones advised to run as a lot as that American soldier with a stay grenade. very last, yet no longer least, international heritage has shown all by the a at the same time as that once there is warfare there are civilian casualties. it truly is why I strive against liberalism right here interior the States because in case you had your way, the hammer and sickle could be waving interior the Washington air. i'm sorry your concepts has been poisoned by technique of liberalism.
2016-12-03 00:35:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
How can we win a foreign civil war when the combatants have ethnic hatreds for one another that, not only can we not understand, but have existed ten times longer than our own existence? Furthermore, like in Vietnam, they know we won't be there forever. Lastly, how do you defeat people who feel that by killing themselves, they will attain eternal bliss? And the beat goes on.....
2007-03-30 01:00:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by njmarknj 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
This war is Un-winnable. Just like the overall war on Terror, it cannot be won. The world will just have to adjust to the fact that we will be saddled with terrorists for the rest of mankinds existence.
The violence in the world will never end!!!!
2007-03-30 02:13:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by michael_trussell 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would be our ignorant president! He's all for the war as long as his sorry *** isn't sent to the front lines! I say if he wants to fight it so bad give him a gun and everything else a soldier has to carry so we can let him fight the war that he knows we'll win!
2007-03-30 01:36:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Williamstown 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No one is going to win this war.
2007-03-30 01:00:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by El perro verde 4
·
0⤊
0⤋