As an Englishman it always amazes me how the USA are allowed to have WMDs, but dont like anyone else to have any.
Surely this is unfair, to be quite honest, i would rather a troop of monkeys be in charge of the button than a USAer.
I think the USA is telling porkies and really has none,
The good thing is though, if they do shoot at us, they will probably hit Iceland.
2007-03-30
00:01:14
·
27 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Babydolls- i love you
2007-03-30
00:12:31 ·
update #1
Babydolls-grrrr playing hard to get
2007-03-30
00:19:32 ·
update #2
Thorgirl-she doesnt mean a thing to me, it was nothing.You are my sunshine
2007-03-30
00:31:50 ·
update #3
Sgt g-Saving private Ryan was a film you t w a t
2007-03-30
00:33:27 ·
update #4
Maybe it would be better if all weapons of mass destruction were handed over to an international agency that consists of the 100 biggest population countries of the world, and its core rule would be look after the weapons as well as the median number vote of the 100 wants, but never use or threaten to use any of them unless at least 90 of them agree, with parliamentary support, first.
2007-03-30 01:45:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by profound insight 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes we do, we have several thousands so does the U.K. Countries like the U.S are allowed to have suchs weapons because we will not launch such without good reason.
The only time we ever have was during wartime, WW2, against Japan. It saved thousand of lives, and it ended the war. The U.S will never launch an attack against another country unless we know for a fact that we will be attacked by a WMD or if we've already been attacked.
2007-03-30 00:45:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by D.O... 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, we do. However, the USA has never had a history of launching military campaigns for reasons other than to protect others. Remeber WWII??? You would be speaking German right now if it weren't for us.
The officials who are warranted to lead our military ar elected, and are not dictators or warlords. The European countries are permitted to have WMD's as is China and Russia and Japan. They are not ruled by dictators, rather there is a system of checks and balances.
"It is empirically incorrect to say that one cannot achieve peace through violence. Indeed, without violence, one could never subdue or eliminate those who use violence against the peaceful." - Brooks Mick
2007-03-30 00:28:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Voice of Liberty 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I totally agree!!!
And yes, Americans would probably hit Iceland by accident. I find it amazing that about half of us probably couldn't even find England on a map.
2007-03-30 03:30:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
11,500 nuclear warheads should constitute WMD, don't you think? Our chemical and biological stockpiles are in the process of being totally destroyed. You should also take a look at your own country, UK. They have quite a number of nukes, too. Take Camilla, for instance...
2007-03-30 00:07:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by gone 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hey! The UK is also chock a block with WMD, purchased maily from the USA!!! Have you not been following the news about Trident?!
2007-03-30 00:05:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by fleur 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes we do, but we also have something new: weapons of mass conception.
This is a nuclear type device that uses marijuana instead of plutonium. When detonated the device create a severe urge to merge. The enemy becomes overwhelm with their libido. They drop their weapons, go home, and work hard at creating future generations.
This weapon is highly classified, so please keep it hush hush.
2007-03-30 01:05:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by .... . .-.. .-.. --- 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes we have WMDs and we give ourselves permission to have them, as does GB. Sorry about your preferences but they make even less sense than your rant. Is this the product of a public school education?
2007-03-30 00:05:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
They have them to cause a diversion while the the worlds preoccupied worrying what they`re going to do with their nukes .They`re over there laughing up their sleeve and killing us all off with their MacDonald's ,coke and dodgy pharmaceuticals
2007-03-30 02:36:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by keny 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, called Bush and Cheyney
2007-04-01 10:14:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by cassidy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋