It is very simple matter to settle by negotiating with Iranians.
India and Pakistan faces similar situation now and then and they get settled the issues by negotiations, U.K., should also negotiate with the Iran Government and settle the matter of tresspassing of Iran territory by British sailors.
2007-03-29 19:11:36 · 10 answers · asked by amitabh_bachan1947 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Oh its simple is it, simple to negotiate with a country who's leader wants to wipe Israel off the face of the earth, who calls for a conference to try and dis-prove that the Holocaust actually happened, if Iran really wants a simple peacefull solution to this why doesn't it just let these service men and women go, and sort out the issue of trespassing after, instead of provoking the situation by parading these people on Iranian TV and using the most insidious form of propaganda that only countrys like this use in the vain hope to make their own people believe that what they are doing is right, what actual good are they doing to their cause by holding on to them, if they wanted to be seen as a reasonable moderate nation that is.
If anyone is trying to trigger a situation and pull the rest of the world in, then it is Iran and if you believe otherwise then you are simple!!!
2007-03-29 19:46:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
r u really that stupid? They do not want to negotiate with you, they only want to kill you.. and blowing iran off the map will not start ww3, it will end hostilities ,, for a short while.. because the whole world will be too afraid to even belch loudly to consider doing any more stupid crap like taking hostages in international or Iraqi waters.. Do you remember the hostages iran took during carter's administration? Regan ended the "crisis" by sinking half of Irans fleet.. You don't win peace by negotiating with a monster-- you just kill the damn thing ..
2007-03-29 20:10:42 · answer #2 · answered by mr.phattphatt 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It was made very clear that Great Britain did not trespass into Iran's space. There are photos and radar readings to attest to Iran's intent to cause problems at this time. We will not start WW3 but if Iran doesn't return the detainees then they could be in for a very strict monetary blockage plus other forceful sanctions which would cripple Iran. This depends upon the cooperation of France (bastards) and Germans....mainly Germans. It is a long detailed discussion so I will not go into it here, but believe me the USA and G.B. could break Iran's back without a war.
2007-03-29 20:08:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Get this straight everyone:
World War III is in REFERENCE to the Soviet/American Cold War of the 50s to the early 90s. (a.k.a.: NUCLEAR WAR.)
A Global Civil War or the Fourth World War is in reference to an all out conflict involving a group of nations using conventional weapons in either the Middle East or Greater Asia--spreading outwards--which doesn't use nuclear weapons!
2007-03-29 20:14:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
USA and UK must force Iran to stop its nuclear arms build-up through a blockade and not another war that could escalate into World War III.
2007-03-29 19:30:13 · answer #5 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
First you can not negotiate with these loonies.
Second, you need to wake up and smell the coffee, we have been in WW III for several years now
2007-03-29 19:17:54 · answer #6 · answered by Kye H 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The UK will do what they want and have to do to get their sailors home safe..why are you involving the USA?
If there is a ww3 you won't know it anyway... with nuclear weapons, it will be over so quickly and nobody will win.
so don't worry about it.
2007-03-29 20:01:09 · answer #7 · answered by gemma 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
as planned... Republican Congressman Ron Paul warned of a "false flag event" to get USA into IRAN 2 months ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6d8MIENVtKw
2007-03-29 19:16:05 · answer #8 · answered by what_do_i_know? 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
wont happen, theyll be a peacefull resolution soon.
the less drama about these events the better.
when world war 3 arrives, everyone will no. but this situation, wont cause it
2007-03-29 19:17:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
we want to negotiate, but they don't seem to be to interested.
2007-03-29 20:24:46 · answer #10 · answered by ati-atihan 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋