English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-29 18:56:49 · 12 answers · asked by Surfer Dude 2 in News & Events Current Events

12 answers

Even though the government lied about 9/11. No, the government was not involved. But, need to look at who was in and around WTC at the time. And was running things. Zionists. Larry Silverstein the 5 Mossad Agents filming prior; yes, prior to the collapse and 2 Mossad Agents on GW Bridge with a bomb.

If our government lied it is for good reason. Since Israel is now bending us over and royally screwing us.

Being Jewish, I hate one type of person in my life with extreme hatred for what they did. It was Zionists which started the Holocaust. It was Zionists that could have saved us. I think it is about time to turn Israel into a Glass Parking Lot for attacking us.

2007-03-30 04:12:37 · answer #1 · answered by Kitty 4 · 0 4

I don't think GWB and his cronies would be that stupid or evil to allow or be the cause of the 9/11 attacks. Remember the Republicans only just scraped in to serve a second term. America sis ignore a lot of evidence about a possible attack, from what I've read it seem the multi level buearocracy did not help much either.

2007-03-29 19:38:43 · answer #2 · answered by Brad H 2 · 1 0

Why do you keep asking the same Question? Do you work for the government or something? Anyone Interested please watch a video on the internet called Loose change it's one of the most amazing things about 911 I've ever seen. Just keep an open mind.

2007-03-30 04:34:58 · answer #3 · answered by mikejets69 2 · 1 1

Answer has to be NO.

Bush reacted so poorly in the first few days that if it had been an insider and Bush knew about it, he would make himself look like a real hero and save the USA and the planet in a single leap.

2007-03-29 20:19:04 · answer #4 · answered by hehe haha 4 · 2 0

Gee, that's a hard one. Lets see...... 4 airplanes, the Twin Towers, The Pentagon, and the plane aiming for bush's ranch... plus all the people in the Twin Towers when they hit.
You can't expect me to believe that everyone signed their life away just so this sad excuse of a government would be happy.

2007-03-29 21:56:41 · answer #5 · answered by Williamstown 5 · 2 0

Sure. Because they wanted to go to Iraq they created fake SAUDI hijackers and killed thousands in plane wreck so they have to dish out millions in government subsidies to airline companies. I'm sure US gov like handing out free moneys. And they were able to execute perfect secret plan to kill 3000 of its own citizens, but couldn't produce convincing WMD case which nobody really believed. Not even UN who didn't give green light to Iraq War. Pretty weird they'll convinced millions it was Osama, but couldn't convince UN Iraq had WMD. Seem like it'll be pretty easy to make few fake evidence compares to fake massacre.

Yea there are lot of detail info on that inside job story. There are also lot of details on those loose weight quick pills. They can be pretty convincing to people who are desperate to lose weight.

I think it is ironic that people who are extremely skeptic of our own government have extreme unconditional faith in these so called 9/11 'truthers.'

Is 9/11 an inside job?
May be, I don't know, but I still don't think those weight loss pills really work as they claim.

They tell me I should be deep skeptic. Those 9/11 truthers. So I really am skeptic that this 9/11 have such elegant explanation about how gov carried out attack on its own people.

2007-03-29 20:20:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No. We were warned- but we didn't "listen". So we kinda "set ourselves up" for what happend on 9/11.

2007-03-29 19:18:22 · answer #7 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 1 1

.http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/03/05/ward.htm

2007-03-29 19:05:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

With everything that has happened, and they evidence against the presidency i wouldn't doubt it...
have you seen the movie 911? its more a documentary by that guy who made super size me or something like that.

2007-03-29 19:00:53 · answer #9 · answered by Ashy 2 · 1 6

honestly i wouldn't doubt it. look it gave a president with failing reviews the chance to "redeem" himself (and his father). this also pretty much guaranteed him re-election into office, if he were voted out it could have shown that the nation was not unified..and every president up for re-election during a war in our history was re-elected. it also gave bush a reason to "take over" iraq and its oil--remember he is from texas and "friends" with oil tycoons. there was also information that the president and such received prior to the attack that they didn't take seriously. look at the status of our nation since he has taken office....... need i say more?

2007-03-29 19:10:45 · answer #10 · answered by witchway915 3 · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers