2007-03-29 15:07:57 · 14 answers · asked by LONG H 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
No, just regulated much more, and maybe seen a little more by the public. However, its purpose is good for our country.
2007-03-29 15:10:34 · answer #1 · answered by cliffburtongodofthebass 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Leave it open and lock some American Military criminals in there start with John Walker and the the GIs that raped and murdered a 14 yr old child,then our friendly fire soldiers and maybe some torturers from Abu Graib how long before they would be allowed basic human rights are .See if David Hicks is proved guilty he should take his punishment as long as he is treated the same as his allies but he wasn't.
2007-03-29 22:21:10 · answer #2 · answered by molly 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. I feel guilty for even living in the same country that tortures its prisoners in unspeakable ways. By doing this, we are stooping to the terrorists' level. We have driven these poor, brainwashed prisoners insane. Several have actually asked for the option to commit suicide.
Guantanamo Bay is just more motivation for hatred towards the U.S.
2007-03-29 22:14:44 · answer #3 · answered by Gordon Freeman 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Either close it or make it subject to the same rules as any other American prison on American soil (Guantanamo is a military base, right?)
2007-03-29 22:12:14 · answer #4 · answered by ash 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think it is a good location...I don't want the bastards on our soil...they are pretty isolated there and it's not in the U.S. Look the war on terror sucks...the people we fight hide in the shadows and carry out heinous attacks against women and children, they follow zero Geneva conventions articles of war. So if we bend the rules a little to hold them in gitmo...too F'n bad, stop bearing arms against us and we will leave you alone.
2007-03-29 22:14:40 · answer #5 · answered by Steelhead 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is a dilemma for the US...something we have not faced before. At least those there are not in our backyards...that's a plus. And, contrary to the leftists, life there is better for the inmates than most working Americans can claim, with free health care and individually prepared meals catered to their tastes.
2007-03-29 22:20:33 · answer #6 · answered by Dr. J 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes,,, GITMO,, was opened because of an illegal war,, the invasion and occupation of Iraq is George W.'s failure,,
the USA will be paying for his mistake for generations to come,, to be paying for his prisoners,, wouldn't be appropriate,, unless he and his VP Dick are sent there as war criminals as well,,,,
how would Americans react to photo's of George and Dick in a pyramid, naked,,,
do you think Dick should be on the bottom and George on the top,, or vice versa,,,,,
2007-03-29 22:18:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely not. I like it because it pisses the secular progressives off. They can't get near it to stage some idiotic protest and that creates chaos in their pointy little heads.
2007-03-29 22:11:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Charge em, try em, free em or fry em, but do it right away. There is no excuse for America to take part in torture.
2007-03-29 22:11:10 · answer #9 · answered by teetzijo 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, it should be expanded and other camps set up as well.
2007-03-30 20:02:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋