What natural objects, ideas, and things might represent wisdom and/or intelligence? These things can be animals, general things, such as waves or the sun, plants, and possibly some simple man-made objects, such as arrows.
2007-03-29 14:55:20 · 12 answers · asked by ☢☠☣☢☠☣ 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
that I can draw.
2007-03-29 15:29:48 · update #1
A large massive tree. One you can tell is centuries old, is twisted and changed witht he enviroment and the years buit still reachs above us towards the heavens.
2007-03-29 14:58:59 · answer #1 · answered by slawsayssss 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What Represents Wisdom
2016-10-19 08:16:35 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A rock that has been forged within the earth, and has stood the tests of time. It contains multitudes of fragments, is there for all to see, and is at peace with the elements, neither asking nor giving, just being. Best wishes
2007-03-29 15:44:08 · answer #3 · answered by tylernmi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Logos, the word, is wisdom.
Something that took a long time to form that lasts a long time might be a good metaphor, like a stone or a diamond. If the stone can carry vibrations (sound, like the word, vibrations) or a crystal that can vibrate to harmonics might be interesting
2007-03-29 15:00:51 · answer #4 · answered by greengo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Trees, the ocean, a prism. Natural formations which allow connections. Gears can be a symbol of wisdom, and upward formations. A sculptured garden can be nice, thank you.
2007-03-29 15:06:54 · answer #5 · answered by Marissa Di 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/avFP5
You are boasting yourself of beeing critic and logical as you are giving critics of others thoughts, aren't you? But, how can you be critic and logic, claiming others ignorance while steping aside your own flaws and non-logical explanations? How can you dare be critic and logical while being affirmative and presumptuous? This is purely arrogant and fed up with contradiction and non-sens. It was writen something interresting about that at Delphy nearby Apollon's temple: Know thyself. I do not pretend to be wise, nor do I affirm I am teh carrier of wisdom, but I think I must be greater than you i nterms of Vertu as "The only thing I know is that I know nothing aside my own ignorance." Think if it's so purely illogic to think this as even saying the inverse is the pure affirmation of something you don't know. Then, either answer upon believes with believes or upon logic with logic. To dude: How can you affirm, with logic, that this does not exist? This is pretention to Thruth. If you want to stay logical and rationnal, there's no way you can affirm something does not exist or at least show a logical demonstration of YOURS to support your affirmation. An example: A given affirmation: B does not exist. Opposites excludes each other as each represent the lack of the other. None of any direct opposition can be used as qualification of something both at at once in a given time and space. For example, can your eyes be both sick and healthy? Can you be both rich and poor, in money terms? Can you be both evil and good? Obvisouly, no. Then, to prove the belonging of somethign to a group, you have either to know everything that is in this group or anything that is not in this group or knowing the qualifications required to be in or not to be in and the complete defenition of the given object to place. If you want to affirm that X does not exist, then you must at least know what's X and what makes something existant being existant or the inverse. Can you define existance? Can you define X? Can you define inexistance? But, even you find a logical answer, there might be flaws, could it? Show me, give me a proof that you cannot make any flaws in any circumstance and about each subject at each second or assume you can make mistakes. Then, if it is not constructed the right way, when you'll keep your explkanation, it won't be logic anymore at some point, wouldn't it? What I conclude is that knowledge is related to everything and that the presence, if I can speak so for now and not to say existance because it must also be related to inexistance, causes this knowledge to be related to it. Then, only one Truth can be observed. Then, none of any logically constructed explanation can, at some point, fail to explain it. And if a human making a demonstration can fail by making mistakes and that other humans can fail to see them, they are relying onto lies and illusions. Then, none can pretend to Truth if not to say they're conscient of their ignorance. I have no pretention to be right, just to be critic with your answer.
2016-04-11 01:51:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
An apple, as from the apple from the Tree of Knowledge in the Garden of Eden.
2007-03-29 15:45:20 · answer #7 · answered by Karebear 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Traditionally, the image of the Owl is the visual symbol of wisdom.
2007-03-29 15:03:41 · answer #8 · answered by russiancatsima 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Old man with a cain
Owl
Tree
Large dusty book
2007-03-29 17:20:44 · answer #9 · answered by Michael M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gray hair, and wrinkles. Pretty much signs of old age.
2007-03-29 15:02:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋