Somehow we have to pay for the biggest deficit in history. How would you suggest? Borrow from your great grandkids?
2007-03-29 14:57:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
They will raise taxes. That's a given. That will stifle the economy and increase unemployment. I love the way they say that this is needed to reduce the deficit or pay for the war when it's proven that raising tax rates produces less revenue. They just want to play to their voting base by instituting more giveaway programs to the lazy.
2007-03-29 15:23:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Link to your source, then explain how you would pay for the Big Bad Bush Deficit.
Oh I get it now, you mean roll back the Bush tax cuts that were put in place without proper planning, that made me feel like he was paying us each three hundred bucks for letting him get elected by the supreme court. The first time we ever went to war on a tax cut instead of shared sacrifice. That what you mean? Rolling back a tax cut is not the same thing as a new tax - or maybe it is in this era of conservative doublespeak.
2007-03-29 15:09:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by ash 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
did you understand what you're talking about? that isn't any longer an advance, that is purely letting the perfect tax cuts run out... baisically, that is like asserting the second one day after thanksgiving that each and each body the prices went up because each and each of the sales are not on anymore... that is voodo math... and maximum human beings of the cuts were to the rich... too undesirable for the rich
2016-12-03 00:17:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Typical Democratic thinking, even when the Bush economy is bringing in record taxes due to the improved business environment.
Sad thing is they know it too. Bash Bush, blame him, increase taxes, say it is for the deficit, then turn around and use if for something else, and increase the size of government once again.
2007-03-29 15:06:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by George 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
What about shrinking the size of government? Oh wait. Silly me! Dems are in charge. What was I thinking?
2007-03-31 08:32:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you are talking about some real money.
2007-04-02 11:12:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by edward m 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
So where do you neo-cons think the money for this war is coming from?
Wishful thinking?
You cry about dems not supporting the war, then when they have to raise taxes to pay for it, you blame them.
Do neo-cons have any accountability at all?
2007-03-29 15:13:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The democratic party credo~~when in doubt, raise taxes!
2007-03-29 14:59:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bawney 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Democrats never want to be judged on their results, only intentions.
They cannot protect us, do not understand economics, and are run by leftist/communist/socialist nuts.
2007-03-29 15:10:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
3⤊
1⤋