fund the war?
Taxpayers have to pay for Agribusiness E-coli boo boo.
2007-03-29 14:28:59 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yes it helps them get re-elected.
2007-03-29 14:38:52 · answer #1 · answered by bill j 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush seeks to cut 150 programs, calls them "a complete waste of tax payer money." These programs cut include all after school program funding, a nationwide adult literacy program, two billion in college grants, drug awareness education, law enforcement grants, etc., while increasing foreign aid and money for the war (while decreasing money for homeland security). Perhaps if Dems didn't pay for this war there'd be enough for both spinach farmers, school systems, police protection and heathcare for all. Or would you rather spend the money on war?
2007-03-29 21:58:30 · answer #2 · answered by Doctor ~W. 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
As opposed to all those famers going out of business and becoming bankrupt? Resulting in all the lost jobs, and lost income?
No, it has nothing to do with funding the war. It has to do with helping Americans. Something that Bush has forgetten about.
2007-03-29 21:33:48 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Palsies husband is a Rich spinach farmer!!! no kidding! Sorry I don't remember where I read that!
2007-03-30 00:50:43 · answer #4 · answered by mark k 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Better millions to the people who help feed us, than BILLIONS to the people who's only interest is themselves and the fat, no-bid contracts they can glean.
Or is that too complicated for you?
2007-03-29 21:33:00 · answer #5 · answered by Yoda Green 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
no
2007-03-29 21:49:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋