nothing cannot apply to something obviously as it is would not be nothing if you knew it was there. i agree, it does exist in the 'figure of speech' context but it cannot apply to an object if the object IS there to be seen. e.g " there is nothing in the box" as in the box is EMPTY. it is just the English language once again being very vague and ultimately confusing. must say brilliant question!!!!
2007-03-29 14:31:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by pacrugs 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who said space is something? Space is not a thing it is a concept. Space is a void between things. Without things there would be no void. Space is the lack of a thing. But now is a concept a thing? Its not a physical thing. But it is a thing that comes from the human mind, assuming an idea is a thing. So space is something mental but not physical.
I guess that's how I see it.
2007-03-29 16:35:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by justin 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing is the opposite or negative of something , therefore is a something , it is the space uninhabited by some thing inside a room or the universe , you can flow trough with ease or fly in the space of negative something , you can measure this negative space by cubing the surrounding something so becomes the amount of nothing something .
2007-03-29 15:28:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by young old man 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing is a word, a linguistic symbol to represent a concept of a change in the time/space continuum due to the human habit of duality and perceptive notion of opposites. So if there is thing, in another place or time, there can be no-thing. It is a catch-all for everything we cannot find a corresponding opposite like hot/cold, man/woman. So what is the opposite of a tree? Nothing.
2007-03-29 14:47:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by pixilatedpi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You have brought up an age-old debate here. Before one can answer if nothing exists, they must answer what "something" really is. Quantum physics suggests that what we perceive as real may not exist when we close our eyes or leave the room. After all, what basis have we for believing otherwise? Until we know what is and what is not real, how can we begin to determine what nothing truly is?
2007-03-29 14:33:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Cincinnati Jack 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Space does not exist by itself.
Einstein showed that space only exist as a relative measure of distance between things.
If there are no things -- there is no way to measure this distance, so there would be space.
In fact there would be no time either, as time is directly linked to mass.
2007-03-29 14:53:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by hq3 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Space without matter is just an abstract concept, not something real.
Space, matter, speed, time, are all linked. No one can exist without the others.
2007-03-29 14:32:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by NaughtyBoy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Space can either hold something or not.
Nothing is the lack of something. The space between something is nothing.
2007-03-29 17:16:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Michael M 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a mind bender, really. If nothing exists, then something, namely nothing, exists, so nothing cannot exist because something therefore must always exist even if what exists is nothing.
2007-03-29 14:30:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by sonyack 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If nothing doesn't exist, then what do you refer to with the word "nothing?"
Without nothing, there wouldn't be anything.
2007-03-29 23:06:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Camillo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋