Given that in exercising one's will, one unites one's consciousness with another phenomena, in consciousness, and thus will is of the nature of love, is love to be considered of primary import, or is the will ? Is the distinction arbitrary ? Or a willed choice, and thus, reductiat ad absurdum ...
2007-03-29 13:27:15 · 7 answers · asked by Thelemic Warrior 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
FALSE
2007-03-29 13:36:14 · answer #1 · answered by Sophist 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All words are lies...this is the underlying problem with verbal philosophical considerations. Meaning they are only symbols of the real, in mathematics there are equations that repeat indefinitely, you have touched one of the philosophical questions that does the same, to whit; Love under will, under love under will, under love, etc.
2007-03-29 20:33:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Will can only be exported, but Love must be imported first, then exported!0!
Enjoy!
2007-03-29 20:56:12 · answer #3 · answered by Alex 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not good enough to even be false...
It's reductio ad absurdum, BTW...
2007-03-29 21:29:00 · answer #4 · answered by mcd 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Will is positive, the Judgment is negative.
2007-03-29 20:47:44 · answer #5 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God is Love and Love Is Blind but can we say that God is Blind ? NO!!!!
Consider in this aspect and we will get the true meaning of LOVE in our LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-29 20:31:32 · answer #6 · answered by cabridog 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If love is the law, then why is it blatantly abused?
2007-03-29 20:34:30 · answer #7 · answered by Da Mick 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋