Should the GWB admin. be brought up on charges of International terrorism?

Question

Why not?

Answer 1

He should be brought up on charges of being a War Criminal, which he is!

He should be impeached before he can nuke Iran with that no strings money he wants!

----
George W. Bush as the New Richard M. Nixon: Both Wiretapped Illegally, and Impeachably;
Both Claimed That a President May Violate Congress' Laws to Protect National Security
By JOHN W. DEAN
----
Friday, Dec. 30, 2005

On Friday, December 16, the New York Times published a major scoop by James Risen and Eric Lichtblau: They reported that Bush authorized the National Security Agency (NSA) to spy on Americans without warrants, ignoring the procedures of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

It was a long story loaded with astonishing information of lawbreaking at the White House. It reported that sometime in 2002, Bush issued an executive order authorizing NSA to track and intercept international telephone and/or email exchanges coming into, or out of, the U.S. - when one party was believed to have direct or indirect ties with al Qaeda.

Initially, Bush and the White House stonewalled, neither confirming nor denying the president had ignored the law. Bush refused to discuss it in his interview with Jim Lehrer.

Then, on Saturday, December 17, in his radio broadcast, Bush admitted that the New York Times was correct - and thus conceded he had committed an impeachable offense.

There can be no serious question that warrantless wiretapping, in violation of the law, is impeachable. After all, Nixon was charged in Article II of his bill of impeachment with illegal wiretapping for what he, too, claimed were national security reasons.

These parallel violations underscore the continuing, disturbing parallels between this Administration and the Nixon Administration - parallels.

Bush violated the law by illegally attacking a soveriegn nation.

Bush violated the law when he set up secret CIA torture camps in places like Poland!

Bush violated the law, the Geneva Conventions by doing so and then not allowing the red cross to see them! Even the North Koreans and N.Vietnam did that!

Name me a law he hasn't broken!

"Where have we indiscriminately attacked buildings filled with unarmed civilians?"

Well we attacked Iraq and I think many civilians were in those buildings! We attack buildings everyday with unarmed civikians!

Answer 2

no, there have been no international laws broken. As for terrorism - we do not fight in that type of style. what about the actual terrorist groups. It is a violation to capture people and cut off their heads, to kill our soldiers execution style and drag their bodies throuh the streets - that is a serious infraction. and not following the IAEA mandates and treaties on nuclear weapons is also a serious infraction. premptive striking to protect our country- is good, premptive attacks to destroy terrorists out posts - even better . and all the while our boys have to fight with rules . While our enemy fights with none. Therefore you feel the need to question the US first. hmmm think about that.

Answer 3

Because the GWB administration has not committed terrorism or violated any law.

If you have proof otherwise, state it or be quiet.

Answer 4

No.
Terrorists specifically target civilians.

Answer 5

No Bush is not the terrorist. The people who are setting off car bombs, subway bombs and trying to blow up airliner are

Answer 6

Is liberalism a mental illness?

Answer 7

patience my friend its in the works they keep trippin all over the lies they have spilled for the last 6 years it willl all fall apart soon.....OH HAPPY DAY

Answer 8

No.

Where have we indiscriminately attacked buildings filled with unarmed civilians?

Answer 9

No, simple war crimes will do fine.

Answer 10

if there were just cause, it would have happened already!