When faced with a link they won't read it when you post the information they won't read it or can't which is what I believe.
2007-03-29 12:44:43 · 24 answers · asked by ? 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Wolf- An ability to read and comprehend.
2007-03-29 12:53:17 · update #1
Are Conservatives grammatically challenged? Your question is a run-on sentence.
2007-03-29 12:55:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I read alot of people's links, conservative and liberal alike. Just because you have a link doesn't mean it's a credible source. If you post a blog site or the Drudge report, you're going to get many distortions and lots of lies when it comes to Drudge for example. Just make sure your source or site isn't a bunch of obvious right wing propaganda and people will read it. But don't expect everyone to buy the information without picking it apart piece by piece. liberals are trained to critique, not swallow a bunch of garbage when it's thrown at us.
mr_metha… Considering most people didn't vote during that election, I'd say that you're really not saying much. Nonetheless you really didn't look at your sources too well, because you completely misquoted the numbers.
No college degree: Bush 49% Kerry 47%
College degree: Bush 49% Kerry 49% a tie
No high school degree: Bush 49% Kerry 50% a virtual tie
H.S grad Bush 52% Kerry 47%
Some college Bush 54% Kerry 46%
College grad Bush 52 Kerry 46%
Post Grad Bush 44% Kerry 55%
So you see, the higher up you get, you start understanding the quality of education in a post graduate education versus a simple undergrad education. You obviously forgot how close this race really was all across the board.
If the race was held today, you know that Bush wouldn't even get 27%.
2007-03-29 12:56:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm a non-illiterate liberal. I'd like to point out that you use bad sentence structure in your question. You need more "." and ",".
As far as links go, some people tend to slap a link to an article that has three pages as their question, with the words "read this" accompanying it. It's ridiculous to assume that someone's going to sit there and read all of it.
I would suggest that people who wish to discuss a story on Answers copy and paste the important parts, stick them in between quotations, and provide some of their own commentary.
2007-03-29 12:57:39 · answer #3 · answered by amg503 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No. Many of the links posted by neocons directly contradict what they are implying. This happens when the poster only reads the first few paragraphs and thinks they've stumbled on something to their liking.
2007-03-29 13:00:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Judging from the way you worded your question, you really have no right to call anyone illiterate. Take some night courses in basic grammar and english.
2007-03-29 12:52:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
I think you should learn proper sentence structure before labeling others illiterate.
2007-03-29 13:14:15 · answer #6 · answered by Your Teeth or Mine? 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Quite possibly the answer to your question could be that they have set the spam filters on their computers to weed out ignorant and irrational innuendo filled diatribes.
2007-03-29 12:59:41 · answer #7 · answered by Political Enigma 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You probably didn't inclose a check with your letter. It's amazing how a little cash can improve the reading quality of the government officials.
2007-03-29 12:48:47 · answer #8 · answered by rann_georgia 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think you have been watching too much FOX News and listening to too much HATE radio. A mind is a terrible thing to waste!
You are a handsome devil though!
2007-03-29 14:00:05 · answer #9 · answered by mrsfeelsgreat15 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Im very illiterate with a degree in mechanical engineering.
What do you have Einstein?
2007-03-29 12:49:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋