Do you suppose part of the "mission" may be to protect the over one hundred thousand civilian workers in country?
2007-03-29 12:37:25 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
They are winning the oils almost privatized
2007-03-29 13:01:03 · answer #1 · answered by fiddich59 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
who says that we can't win, it has already been proven that there is no civil war in Iraq. Maybe the news media has been lying all along, and the dems just forgot what winning is all about and used the losing aspect to bring conflict with the president. my question to you, how many years after the defeat of bothe Germany and Japan were we still fighting their version of insurgents, and how long have US troops been in both country's. We have become a society of instant gratification, we want everything now- well some of the best things in life and for future generations take diligence and perseverence.
2007-03-29 20:02:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The civilian workers are there to support the mission.
So saying the mission is to protect them is circular.
The real reason is the Bush feels guilty because we trashed their country, and wants to stay until it's all better. But that's going to take decades before they can make everything ideal.
No other objectives or goals or measurable standards have been proposed, and Bush is adamant against doing so.
2007-03-29 19:42:11 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Who said we can't win? General Petreus believes we can and, quite frankly, that's good enough for me. We can win this war--make no mistake about it--but it's going to take a lot of gutsiness from the American people. The only way we lose the war is by losing our will and that is entirely up in the air.
2007-03-29 19:55:21 · answer #4 · answered by YourMom 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
this is the question everyone is asking president bush. while i definetely do not support the war in iraq, i feel that it is too late to just pull them out now. however i think they need to set a date within the next 2-3 years and make a plan to start pulling our troops out, so we can maybe save some american's lives.
2007-03-29 19:50:20 · answer #5 · answered by ladaloop88845 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Winning will take military action, not political action from Congress. If Congress would let the military leaders do their jobs it probably would be over by now. But ever since Ike fired McArthur, politician have thought they they know best and have fought the wars and lost.
2007-03-29 19:47:48 · answer #6 · answered by Princess of the Realm 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
no,, the mission was for GWB to go after his Daddy's number one enemy,,, while he was invading Iraq,, the number one enemy of the US and the world Osama bin Laden,, was allowed to go free,,, now he has regrouped and retrained,,,, Bush, Cheney,, Rove,, Gonzales,, their going out,, one by one,,,
Nancy Pelosi,, will be a great interim president,, until the 2008 elections,,,, when a Democrat will be elected to get our country back,,,
Bush has made a fiasco of his administration,,,,
2007-03-29 20:03:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No they are just over there to eliminate some of the conservatives in this country because people are sick of them being around.
2007-03-29 19:45:59 · answer #8 · answered by slawsayssss 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
to protect the iraqians and to keep them killers out of america
2007-03-29 20:01:28 · answer #9 · answered by early 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The flu or black flag did not arrive to kill us so they send them to"Iraq>"
2007-03-29 19:41:54 · answer #10 · answered by Gypsy Gal 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋