2007-03-29 12:32:14 · 15 answers · asked by Hot Coco Puff 7 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I mean, that type of individual deserves to get it, right?
2007-03-29 12:38:37 · update #1
Cancer is a growth that spreads throughout the body if not discovered and kept in check. Let's take that on an emotional plain. Saddam Hussein had an emotional cancer that drove him to new heights during his reign as President of Iraq - power and the thirst for the very same. All he cared about was that power. It was this emotional cancer that had finally done him in - he was becoming dangerous even more so than before.
2007-03-30 02:43:27 · answer #1 · answered by Laela (Layla) 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
People like Saddam Hussein get diseases all the time. Kim Jong Il's father (Kim Il Sung) died of a heart attack. Fidel Castro has been out of action from diverticulitis. It happens. Just wait.
As for who deserves what... let's just say that I happen not to be the person who hands out cosmic justice and I'm personally very happy that is the case. I feel completely unequipped to decide who deserves what most of the time. The world is just too complicated! I'd probably do something silly like be nice to everyone all the time.
But that's me.
2007-03-29 12:39:57 · answer #2 · answered by Doctor Why 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm sorry but no-one deserves to get cancer, we have a justice system to deal with such peopl as him, no mabye it doesnt always work I agree, but only God himself can detemine when a person is stripped of his life regardless of how wretched that individual may be, however I still dont think anybody regardless deserved cancer .
2007-03-29 12:45:31 · answer #3 · answered by kissaled 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Preposterous! properly, if it were so, then we may have considered many conspiracy theories going around the world - and we see them periodically. could or not that is Saddam Hussein and his evil twin .. he he he or the Apollo project. Or say about the espionage events international huge. those are only observed to snatch publicity. i understand CNN and FOX : extraordinarily a lot admired in India right here.
2016-12-03 00:09:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because killing people is good cardiovascular exercise, and as everybody knows, regular exercise lowers the risk of cancer!
Thank you, come again!
PS. If you kill every doctor who ever examines you, and tells you that you have cancer, then eventually all your doctors will tell you that you are the picture of health; so even if you DO have cancer, you'll never know it, and you will continue with your regular activities.
2007-03-29 12:39:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would hardly view his life and his death as some kind of reward. The man spent most of his life pre-occupied with fear, saw his sons murdered, his family sent into shame and exile, went from living in palaces to a hole in the ground, and died at the hands of his enemies. Given this, one might surmise that his evil deeds did not go unpunished.
2007-03-29 14:10:10 · answer #6 · answered by Timaeus 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They do. Fidel Castro is dying of cancer. The former Shah of Iran died of cancer. That doesn't mean don't want to hang them anyway. We are self-seeking justice society.
2007-03-29 12:38:27 · answer #7 · answered by JOHN 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Cancer is a natural phenomenon. It makes no moral choice.
2007-03-29 12:36:48 · answer #8 · answered by Sophist 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wrong, nobody deserves to suffer no matter how brutal that person is. Besides, we are not God to decide who should get cancer!
2007-03-29 14:15:00 · answer #9 · answered by browneyedgirl90 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Just like Hitler did not get something serious than Cancer!!!
2007-03-29 12:36:32 · answer #10 · answered by cabridog 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋