So, you think the Popular Mechanics debunking article is correct, you may want to read this?

Question

I invite you all to read this article and refute- (make sure you read the sources) anything there. I see all of these ppl saying to read this report, it explains everything, it does not. Just to let you know Popular Mechanics is owned by hearst Publishing- look that up in your encyclopedia and you will find that the first thing it says is that they were the originators of YELLOW JOURNALISM. Many of you will say that this is not a credible site, that is irellevant because the article is well sourced.

Oh, here is the site

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/reply_to_popular_mechanics.htm

socid- you cannot give me one, that was not a refutation

Answer 1

Here's what the "government" and the "established press" want us to believe. That 19 hyjackers that couldn't even fly cessnas overtook 8 pilots who did not have the wherewithall to punch their IFF emergency transponder distress signal. Using only boxcutters and knives as weapons and able to escape the CCTV cameras at Logan, Newark and Dulles airports, managed to fly their aircrafts with pinpoint accuracy into targets that the best trained pilots could not do, all without the aid of instrument ratings; That some guy in a cave somewhere in Afghanistan with a towel on his head and a fan belt wrapped around it, was able to direct these "terrorists", without the NSA picking up their communications, pulling off these maneuvers?! All this against a 37 billion defense budget and a 30 billion dollar "intelligence" budget?! Now tell me, who's the conspiracy theorist?!

Answer 2

you dont have to convince me.I read the 9/11 commission report and the PM article and every thing I could find in print or otherwise.
The PM article at best is weak and full of inconsistencies.The 9/11 report contains outright lies,half truths and doesnt address many salient points.But FEMA admits that WTC 7 coming down because of fire is an EXTREMELY low probability

Answer 3

Do you have a link to the PM article where I can build my own personal hovercraft out of plywood and a vacuum?

Answer 4

I looked at your link, particularly on the WTC7 building as thats the one people seem to use as their ammunition mostly. took me about 15 seconds to find flaws in the theory.

Try either of these

http://www.911myths.com/
http://www.debunking911.com/

Any conspiracy theory and their counter analysis' and even more is pretty well covered.