English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It was anti-climactic, and disappointing to me. What do you think?

2007-03-29 10:32:04 · 1 answers · asked by Icewomanblockstheshot 6 in Arts & Humanities Books & Authors

1 answers

I think you are 100% correct. It was like the Grisham had twenty pages to fill up in order to complete his contract for writing this book and just sort of filled it with stuff that didn't work. The story was already over but he wouldn't let the book go. Yes, it was anti-climactic, because the main points of the book, the conflicts, had already been resolved. I agree with you!

2007-03-29 11:02:26 · answer #1 · answered by John B 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers