2007-03-29 10:01:50 · 26 answers · asked by eggranger 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Nope!
2007-03-29 10:03:55 · answer #1 · answered by Your_Star 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No and I tried to warn others but they were more concerned with doctrines dealing with global issues that could result in people being killed, such as whether or not two gay people can marry each other and making the argument that it much more important to protect a stem cell and embryo than to let mature for 19 years and then send it to war to die. But then again, these are the feeble minds that haven't opened a book in probably more than a decade, unless it was written by notable mental giants such as Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, or Bill O'Reilly. Its sad really to watch someone portray themselves as an informed intellectual when their substance is based on being spoon-fed by Fox News and their greatest contribution to activism is slapping a ribbon-magnet on their car. The writing was on the wall with Bush in 2004, but too many people are scared to exercise critical thought, it is much easier for them to base their decision on what color the Homeland Security Threat-O-Meter was at that day? Hell-Fire Red today, oh god honey grab the kids and the duct tape for christ's sake and we'll ride it out cause Resident Bush will protect us from the boogey man, gay people and the pro choice terrorists!!! Wake up people, if you voted for Bush in 2004 you should probably have your voting priviledges revoked for at least 2 election cycles cause your screwing the world up for the rest of us and besides you just might hurt yourself if you encountered a free thought.
2007-03-29 10:36:47 · answer #2 · answered by YELLFIRE!!! 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Kerry became the optimum reason I voted for Bush interior the 1st place. If it got here to the comparable selection lower back Bush might get my vote lower back. i can't have faith that John Kerry is even a US Senator.
2016-12-15 11:24:52 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In 2004 I voted for Kucinich in the democratic party primary.
I voted for Ralph Nader in the general election.
In 2000, I voted for John Hagelin in the Reform Party primary.
I voted for John Hagelin in the general eleciton.
2007-03-29 10:09:40 · answer #4 · answered by Vegan 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course I voted for bush. No matter how stupid or ignorant I am for voting for bush, I will never admit it. I would rather see the country destroyed, our men in arms killed, and Katrina victims homeless before I admit I was stupid and ignorant.
I am not ashamed of my vote (at least I won't admit it)
2007-03-29 10:08:54 · answer #5 · answered by mark 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The first time I voted for Harry Brown-libertarian- but I did vote for GW the second time. The choices were bad and worse so I chose bad.
2007-03-29 10:06:30 · answer #6 · answered by nessiebear1482 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i was glad i didn't .....before the first election he made a big stink about states rights......when florida law required the votes be recounted following the 2000 election, he filed a lawsuit to stop them.....went downhill from there.
i wouldve voted for perot before i voted for bush.
2007-03-29 10:08:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes both times.
2007-03-29 10:08:38 · answer #8 · answered by Matt M 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I never voted for him as a Texan governor nor as a candidate for President.
For those who make comments about staying Iraq, how about you send your own kids their first? Use your blood and your voting power.
2007-03-29 11:19:39 · answer #9 · answered by hello T 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I wasn't old enough for to vote for him, but I would if I could.
2007-03-29 13:01:12 · answer #10 · answered by Chopper 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way in hell would I ever vote for a republican little on a Shrub! :-)
2007-03-30 19:53:46 · answer #11 · answered by JoJo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋