You are a brat, and you're just having way too much fun with this. Go to your room......
2007-03-29 11:00:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Pepper's Mommy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's just wrong. A 21 year old woman should not be kissing a 13 year old boy, unless she is a family member and it's like a family kiss, but you said she was your girlfriend.
2007-03-29 09:30:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joseph 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whoa. That's what I have to say about your situation. Anyway you can't get into trouble as you are a minor. Your 21 year old girlfriend on the other hand can get into a lot of trouble as you are a minor and what she is doing is called statutory rape. Wow I can't believe how many people are saying that you are a liar. If you were a 13 year old girl and it was a 21 year old guy they would believe it in a heartbeat. Talk about your double standards.
Statutory rape is the crime of sex with a 'minor' under the age of consent (AOC). Statutory rape differs from other types of rape in that overt force or threat need not be present. By law (statute), any such sexual activity is assumed to be coercive since the 'minor' is considered by law to be incapable of giving consent to the acts.
The age at which individuals are considered competent to give consent is the age of consent (AOC). Age of consent is usually the age at which an individual can legally have intercourse with an adult, but in some jurisdictions the AOC establishes the minimum age of sexual conduct with anyone, regardless of age. In jurisdictions with the latter, it would be possible to charge two minors with a violation of the state's AOC.
Many jurisdictions have multiple age determiners for AOC, as well as a second "statutory rape age boundary". For instance, an adult engaging in sexual intercourse in a particular jurisdiction with an individual under the age of 12 may be charged with a full statutory rape charge (a charge fully equivalent in punishment and severity to rape) whereas intercourse with an individual between the ages of 13–16 may be a significantly lesser charge (such as, "unlawful sexual conduct with a minor," or, "criminal sexual conduct with a minor,") depending on the jurisdiction, the age difference between the participants, and other factors. Criminal sanctions for violations of the age of consent which are not statutory rape may range from a minor misdemeanor to a high level felony. For example, if there is a 5 year or more (16-21) difference, it would be considered aggravated criminal sexual abuse, a Class 2 Felony. Some jurisdictions have a third age boundary which is an age of consent that is relevant in situations in which the adult is in a position of authority over the minor (e.g., the minor's teacher, doctor, coach, school principal, mental health provider, et cetera). The massive confusion caused by the various but very different sexual crime laws (which often have legal terms which are not interchangeable or parallel from jurisdiction to jurisdiction) usually leads people to assume that any violation of the age of consent is a "statutory rape" crime.
Laws vary widely in their definitions of statutory rape; some states make exceptions when the older person is also young or of a similar age, or if he or she marries the minor before the act of sexual intercourse or before being charged with the offense. Due to a wide variety of opinions on what the proper age of consent should be, and conflicts between child sex protection laws and the natural exploration of teenage sexuality, statutory rape charges can sometimes be controversial and contradictory.
Some critics contest the legal characterization of unlawful, non-forced sexual contact as "rape" or "sexual assault." In addition to being seen as an incorrect use of those terms, critics believe the absence of a distinction diminishes the severity of actual (forceful) rape. Furthermore, they argue that charges and punishments should reflect the presence of force, so as not to suggest that actual rape is no worse than, for example, non-forced sexual contact with an adolescent.
2007-03-29 09:35:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You already know at 21 that she shouldn't be messing around with a 13 year old. It's illegal.
2007-03-29 09:30:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nico 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If she is really 21 that is illegal, and you could get into a lot of trouble. I suggest getting a new girlfriend.
2007-03-29 09:31:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lisa123 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Umm yes a 13 year old and a 21 year old is illigal and wrong
2007-03-29 09:30:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your only 13. I doubt you even went through puberty yet.
I'd go out with someone your appropriate age.
If that doesn't work out then take a break from girls.
you have a whole life to live.
2007-03-29 09:33:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by _____ 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh yes! big-huge trouble wait a couple more years if u dont want ur gurl 2 go to jail!
2007-03-29 09:30:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by twirlgirl17 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ever heard of statutory rape? if she loves you, she will know better. my advice is to let her go before you get caught up in a mess with the law (since you are a minor)
find a girl your age or at least someone that is not more than 2 years older than you.
2007-03-29 09:31:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by §èxÿtà mmý ® 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If she loves you, you will know it. You will not get in trouble if the both of you keep your mouth shut but if you want to go kiss and tell, then you could land her in the jailhouse.
2007-03-29 10:35:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by K~E~G 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are u kiddin??? that girl is 21,shes a player,forget her,lose her,and go back doing ur homework!!
2007-03-29 09:32:54
·
answer #11
·
answered by Pinky 6
·
0⤊
0⤋