why don't they look into the claims rather than demonize people who bring it up?
2007-03-29
08:14:47
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
mercer, you obviously haven't been paying attention to the evidence.
2007-03-29
08:34:10 ·
update #1
we do have architectural and engineering experts. go to http://stj911.org/
2007-03-29
08:36:15 ·
update #2
look there is plenty of grounds, its not undereducated people- its highly educated people, FACE THE FACTS PEOPLE! i know its uncomfortable, but admitting that the government is full of criminals is the first step in fixing it.
2007-03-29
08:39:24 ·
update #3
only straw men have been "debunked" ricky t.
2007-03-29
09:15:30 ·
update #4
mercer - the twin towers were shut down for a week a few months before 9/11, and bomb sniffing dogs were not allowed in after that. you obviously don't know anything about it either. don't get all of your info from the "debunking" sites, they have intentionally lied in the past.
2007-03-29
09:18:10 ·
update #5
how do explain how the towers fell at freefall speed? they flel in 10 seconds or so. if they had fallen without the help fo explosives, it would have taken over a minute to do so. look at the nova animation, which has been debunked. look it up, the info is out there, and i don't have time to list it all here.
2007-03-29
09:21:38 ·
update #6
and how can we look at the evidence from the rubble - rudy guliani had it all sent off and destroyed.
2007-03-29
09:22:19 ·
update #7
and as a former DA (rudy) he should have known that he shouldn't destroy evidence. bush and cheney also strongly opposed ANY investigation int the collapse of the towers. and you know youve got nothing on WTC building 7.
2007-03-29
09:24:02 ·
update #8
and as a former DA (rudy) he should have known that he shouldn't destroy evidence. bush and cheney also strongly opposed ANY investigation int the collapse of the towers. and you know youve got nothing on WTC building 7.
2007-03-29
09:24:12 ·
update #9
and as a former DA (rudy) he should have known that he shouldn't destroy evidence. bush and cheney also strongly opposed ANY investigation int the collapse of the towers. and you know youve got nothing on WTC building 7.
2007-03-29
09:24:19 ·
update #10
.
david, you are the one who needs help. you suffer from a delusion that the government is full of righteous people.
.
2007-03-29
09:26:19 ·
update #11
go ahead, just demonize and call us crazy. let the new world order kill thousands of you, and take over the world and make a total police state out of it, and reduce the population down to 1 billion. go ahead and do that.
2007-03-29
14:49:00 ·
update #12
The Fox news crew are preparing their usual insult tin foil hat tricks that don't hold water anymore. CNN and Fox will demonize, try to put it in with the same category as holocost denial, personal attacks against one's characters, ignoring the issues, have on "experts" that have made up or no credentials...the list goes on and on.
But it's out now. Only the ignorant choose to stay that way.
2007-03-29 08:34:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, Fox News is going to have a Special Investigation Segment this weekend.
They will investigate "who" ordered Sandy Berger to steal and destroy classified documents to protect Clinton from the 9/11 Commission Investigation of 9/11.
Bill Clinton has narrowly escaped prison his whole life. BUT....... he many not escape this time.
2007-03-29 08:20:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by wolf 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I guess if you are talking about the conspiracy folk, they should present their claims with some real evidence. So far, no one has done that.
Another thing they should try to do is to get some architecture and engineering professionals to do the presenting for them. That way, the world could see that it is not mis-understood data that is being used for evidence.
If you had any evidence, you would not be on Yahoo Answers. You would be finding a newspaper or TV station to broadcast it. Believe me, there are plenty that would do it. However, you do not have any evidence. The experts you talk about pale in comparison to all of the other experts that confirm that what the world witnessed is what happened.
One of the big problems with the conspiracy story is no matter how well built up you think it is, it is still full of holes. How could someone rig the towers to implode without it being noticed first? It would take weeks of work and you would drive just about every person out of the building with all of the demolition of walls that has to be done to get to the structure. There is not a single witness that will say that this happened. Also, why would you need to hijack airplanes to get the job done? Just duplicate the earlier bombings and have it done with trucks or something like that. No need to kill off hundreds of innocent men, women, and children. Also, what about the other planes? What purpose did they serve? One crashed into the Pentagon and one was crashed without hitting anything.
Lets also look at proof. You will need to find and completely document explosives in the rubble. You will need to find people willing to testify in court that they saw or knew of this operation happening. These will have to be credible witnesses. Don't grab someone with 20 years of mental illness and expect that person to be a star witness.
Don't be as idiotic as saying the the Zapruder film proves there was a conspiracy because the head moves back and to the left. You have to have tanglible proof and credible witnesses.
The facts in the case support one story. A group of terrorists hijacked 4 planes. Two of these planes were crashed into the World Trade Center Towers. The damage from the planes on the buildings caused them to fall. One plane was crashed into the Pentagon and passengers in the fourth tried to retake control of the plane and the terrorists crashed it to prevent them from doing it. That is the story.
You claim the government is full of criminals. Ok, prove your claim. Name people in the government and list the evidence that you have against them.
Give me a link to a NEWS (no conspiracy sites, give us a news site that reported this) site that says the towers were closed off for two weeks before the attacks. This is the first I have ever heard of it. That was never mentioned in any of the articles I read. So please provide a link to back up your evidence. Just because you say it is true, does not mean it is true.
You say the rubble was sent off and destroyed. How do you send rubble off and destroy it? Also, in a real life demolition scene, you will not have 100% of the explosives go off. That means there would have been explosives in the debris while everything was being cleaned up. I never once heard about someone finding explosives or accidentally setting some off in the search and cleanup. Remember, the rubble was being searched. The crews were trying their best to find the people who died. Also, don't try to claim that they were all told to ignore anything explosive or to hide it. There were hundreds of people in that clean up and you should be able to find plenty of witnesses willing to testify if that were the case.
2007-03-29 08:18:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by A.Mercer 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
Perhaps if these conspiracy people showed the whole truth, not just the parts they want people to see the media wouldn't demonize them. If you actually do a bit of research you will see that whenever you see a "..." there is a LOT of information, critical information that has been left out. A lot of times the missing information counters what the conspiracy people are saying.
2007-03-29 08:29:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by rz1971 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
The truth has been out since the day after 911.
The conspiracy idiots have been debunked over and over.
It's not a case of being blind, they are just covering their eyes and claiming they can't see.
2007-03-29 08:30:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ricky T 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am pretty sure if it is going mainstream its only because the news doesnt have anybody to laugh at this week. I mean the poor undereducated that have nothing better to do than create fabrication all day, now that makes me feel better about my life..
2007-03-29 08:21:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by this_takes_awhile 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
They have looked at the claims. And shot them down one by one.
But the kooks come round circle back to their first claim and it start all over again.
Much like arguing with a Liberal.
2007-03-29 08:22:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Philip McCrevice 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
20 or so dumbasses posting the same nonsense day in and day out doesn't constitute "mainstream".
2007-03-29 22:49:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It only increases the mental disturbance of the sufferers from these delusions.
Please seek psychiatric help soonest. Or, perhaps just grow up!!!!
2007-03-29 08:18:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Mainstream, as in paying for a web page that other conspiracy nuts can access.
2007-03-29 08:21:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by odinwarrior 2
·
0⤊
3⤋