MOLESTER or KIDDY DIDDLER
2007-03-29 07:33:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by happyday to you 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
Depends on the situation. Lets say a 18-19 year old slept with his 17 year old girlfriend and her parents found out and pressed charges. He'd be classified as a child molester, but he doesn't deserve to have his forehead tattooed....now on the other hand....if a 40 year old molests a child, then yes, They should have a detailed description of their crime tattooed right on their forehead...in bright red ink.
2007-03-29 07:36:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dani 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hell yes! Their forehead should just say plain and simple "I'M A CONVICTED CHILD MOLESTER" and they should also be forced to drive with license plates stating they're child molesters and have signs in their yards saying "CHILD MOLESTER LIVES HERE" They dont deserve to have any rights. Better yet, we need to just ship them all off to their own private island so they have no contact with anyone but other molesters. Castration would be good too but I really dont think it would work, the sickos would find other ways to harm children.
2007-03-29 07:41:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jaim Jaim 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Absolutely, Michael Jackson Wannabe!
2007-03-29 07:34:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Snow Bunnie 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Ohh, yes. It should read, "I like to touch little children's privates". Or, "Kiddie Rapist--I won't stop till you stop me". Which is pretty much true. As far as child molesters go, I don't really believe they can ever, EVER be made to be a functional member of society. Rehabilitation and meetings? No. Castration and humiliation? Yes. Hey, how about "I touch children and have no balls".
2007-03-29 07:40:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes I would because everyone has a right to know if their children are at rish. But these sickos should never be allowed freedom again, they should be locked up in a cell for the rest of their life!
Sick people.
2007-03-29 07:36:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by ukman_2001_uk 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
I'd be in favor of puttin a bullet thru their forehead, just as permanent , but cheaper in the long run.
Lets protect our Kids
One strike , your out
Zero Tolerance.
2007-03-29 07:35:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by EGOman 5
·
8⤊
0⤋
yeah and the tattoo would say " i'm a child molesters...kick me in the nuts as hard as you can until i lose them..." just to make sure everybody would really understand
2007-03-29 07:35:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by marcnancy1 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
I bet Bill O'Reilly wouldn't mind seeing that happen as he has been doing his best to promote Jessica's Law all across the country to protect children from child molesters and killers....
with a MANDATORY 25 yr. min. sentence for all who are con-victed of this crime....
The tattoo should brand them for what they are!!
How about -- PERVERT--DANGEROUS TO CHILDREN!!!
2007-03-29 07:42:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by angelique1225 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, I'd be in favor of that. CHILD MOLESTER in big black letters would do. I'd also endorse complete removal of genitals and that license plate idea.
2007-03-29 07:40:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mungo 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
yes, this way everyone will know he was a child molester, good Idea. I would put abuser on his forehead.
2007-03-29 07:35:43
·
answer #11
·
answered by misty blue 6
·
4⤊
0⤋