Murdering 3000 innocent people? Couldn't he come up with a different way to invade Afghanistan?
2007-03-29 07:16:16 · 33 answers · asked by Ugly Betty 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
JUST LOOK AT THE PICTURES
http://www.wirednewyork.com/wtc/wtc_map.htm
Notice how building 6 stands between building 1 and building 7, notice how building 7 is in between the verizon building and the federal building.
http://www.greatbuildings.com/cgi-bin/gbi.cgi/World_Trade_Center.html/cid_manhattan_pan_si_01-clo.jpg
notice the distance between the buildings.
http://www.greatbuildings.com/cgi-bin/gbi.cgi/World_Trade_Center.html/cid_wtc0915_1280-clo.jpg
notice the damage to building 6, the crater type hole in the middle of building 6. yet it is not completly collapsed. There is very little damage to either the verizon building or the federal building. but right in between those buildings building 7 is completed collapsed! and the building that was in between it and the world trade center tower building has not completly collapsed?
http://www.greatbuildings.com/cgi-bin/gbi.cgi/World_Trade_Center.html/cid_manhattan_before_si_01-clo.jpg
Are you really going to believe that the damage done to building7 caused a complete collapse. and not a complete collapse to building 6?
If seeing is believing here are the best pictures to see for yourself please look at them. be honest with yourself. and answer the question how is that possible?
So the offical story is, if you can believe it - that the building directly beside the WTC tower DOES NOT completely collapse. but the building on the OTHER SIDE OF BUILDING 6 DOES COMPLETELY COLLAPSE?
2007-03-29 07:18:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 9⤋
Actually, the WTC attacks were designed to justify the invasion of Iraq. Furthermore, the 3000 people killed on 9-11 are just the tip of the iceberg. How about the 3200 troops killed in Iraq and thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians? Bush is a fine example of the Christian philosophy.
2007-03-29 07:23:38 · answer #2 · answered by Hemingway 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They need to keep us afraid so that we don't question thier lies...killing people in a high profile place is scary. The goal is and always has been Iraq..we left Afganistan under the control of warlords after we blew up everything that those poor people had. BTW..not to undermine any American who has lost a family member(I am truly sorry for your loss)..3000 is small stuff compared to what we have done in Iraq...more than 660,000 people in Iraq have died scince invasion. Iraq is the size of Texas...this whole thing is totally messed up.
2007-03-29 07:24:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I hope that the liberal citizens on this board with integrity will bash you for this brainless smear comment.
It isn't even a question in all truth...just your hate opinion framed as a question.
Let's do better folks. There are issues that need to be discussed between true liberal and conservative members.
Questions like this are...well there isn't anything I can come up with that wouldn't sound as bad as the questioner.
2007-03-29 07:22:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
and what's worse, he didn't even invade Afghanistan (not saying that he should have) but he used it to go after Iraq! Totally insane. I'm not sure what all went on that day (9/11) but I am not totally convinced that it wasn't our own government's doing, just for a reason to go to war. To those of you who think that is crazy, go watch some of the documentaries about it. Like "Loose Change" which can be found to watch for free here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=9%2F11
seriously, take a look. it's pretty interesting stuff.
2007-03-29 07:21:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Idiots love conspiracy theorys, and very few (if any of them) are true. It just shows how stupid they are. The real confusing theory that gets me is how people with so many working brain cells can be so stupid to believe such rubbish.
I suspect most of them are made up just for entertainment purposes, to give boneheads something to talk about, and probably to give them another reason to hate their government.
2007-03-29 07:23:18 · answer #6 · answered by MARTIN B 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am not a Bush supporter by far, however, I do not think it fair and actually think it reprehensible to accuse the leader of our country of intentional devastation as was perpetrated on 9/11...it was NOT blown up, it was hit by airplanes piloted by terrorists. You sully the memory of those who died in this tragedy by posting inane stuff like this.
And to those of you who reference Pearl Harbor and/or Viet Nam....show your proof! I'm thinking you were not even around or even a thought then!
2007-03-29 07:22:21 · answer #7 · answered by sage seeker 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No he couldn't you can see by some of the responses that people need to believe that our president would never do such a thing just like we didn't do it in pearl harbor or nam.
How else was he going to get a divided country to war EXCEPT by invading us on our own soil. For those of you who choose not to believe fine, Hitler wasn't capable either right?
2007-03-29 07:22:07 · answer #8 · answered by susan 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
What other reason was there to invade? Bush gave the Taliban $43 million in the summer of '01 to eradicate poppies; we weren't exactly on bad terms..
If the US didn't have military bases in Muslim holy lands, if the government didn't unquestioningly support Israel to the point of blocking UN resolutions against blatantly illegal actions, maybe Muslims wouldn't be so pissed off at the US.
2007-03-29 07:20:59 · answer #9 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
nice theory... but bush was looking for a reason to invade Iraq.
Though military officials did submit a similar plan back in the '70's (?) to rally support against Cuba.
2007-03-29 07:20:15 · answer #10 · answered by caladbolg_80 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Everyone just make the kid happy! It's what Bush wants us to do.
Yes, yes it was necessary... Yeah Bush blew some of the building all the way to space! Did you take your Flintstone vitamin today?
2007-03-29 07:21:21 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋