2007-03-29 07:14:57 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance ➔ Careers & Employment
Wow, pretty bold, Now, Do you really deserve an answer?? When where you born 1920??
2007-03-29 07:23:14 · answer #1 · answered by H57heiny 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Surely it depends on the situation!
If the Mother is a central pin in society, a world leading physicist, an indispensable key link in the most important of industries or Government; then yes it makes perfect sense for her to hand her child to a well paid professional, who will offer that child devoted attention on a one to one 'educational' basis, to try and offset the huge gap that NOT having their Mother will leave.
If however, the Mother wishes to abandon her child to escape the responsibility of caring for her own children in favour of working in some mediocre dead end job just to have money to buy the child things and pay for second rate, shared childcare, offered by someone whom is even less qualified, or caring than the mother; then this is obviously wrong!
We have generations of Children growing up in disfunctional families, with out parents present (even the ones that still have at least one parent) because they were too busy earning money! Every body sees the decline in society, but nobody can see why; in hindsight it is a mistake to expect low paid total strangers or worse still: 'nobody', to offer childcare that will raise 'solid citizens'. You really do get what you pay for, and if your holiday in Turkey for a week every year is more important than your children, there is no problem!
If you can afford to spend £20,000 a year or more on fairly decent childcare, it's a good idea, if not its a very bad idea!
2007-03-29 15:18:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you mean in terms of the way it has affected the rest of society - i.e. kids get dumped at nursery and after - school clubs, and the lack of time mothers spend with their children because they work - then you may have a point.....
But if you mean that as an employer it means that work is not completed because of child care commitments, then surely you should think about adapting to letting the mum work from home, thus letting her complete work at her own pace. - And spend more time with the kids.
2007-03-29 15:30:01 · answer #3 · answered by beausbreeches 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In hindsight, I would say it was a mistake to let people like you be in charge of hiring in any sense of the word. "Let" women return to work?
I could give birth to triplets and still outwork you any day of the week! (and take good care of the kids!)
2007-03-29 14:33:42 · answer #4 · answered by Mexico4me 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe if the cost of living was not so high and the pressure on to have the best maybe one parent could stay at home with little one then there wouldn't be as many problems with kids hanging around because no one home
2007-03-30 02:55:55 · answer #5 · answered by dizzydogblack 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would like to say thank you to the very generous 'them' who aloud little old me to go back to work after having my babies
2007-03-29 14:35:51 · answer #6 · answered by taffia's other half 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on them. If they have no problem handing a newborn to a stranger, there's not much that can be done about it.
2007-03-29 14:19:15 · answer #7 · answered by innocence faded 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
LET them work? Your language here represents your opinions already.
2007-03-29 14:23:58 · answer #8 · answered by lillilou 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Do you have an argument to back up that statement or are you just wanting to wind people up??!
2007-03-29 14:20:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What is that I hear? Oh, dinosours!
2007-03-29 15:14:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋