They have a lesbian communist, a Black Muslim fundamentalist and a gay ambulance-chaser as their three most likely choices.
Is the Democrat Party dead?
2007-03-29 06:54:42 · 13 answers · asked by censored 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
It actually helps the democrats when someone gives reasons to vote against them, and those reasons are wrong or stupid.
1. Hillary isn't a lesbian, or a communist. She's a socialist, which is slightly different.
2. Obama is a christian, not a black muslim fundamentalist.
3. Edwards is effiminate, yes, but he isn't gay.
here are some real reasons to vote against her.
She's a socialist (as proven by her advocation of socialized medice).
She also has promised to violate the bill of rights by "taking" oil company profits to create a strategic energy fund.
Amendment 5 states very clearly "nor shall the property of private citizens be taken for the public use without just compensation".
She seems not to care, and I won't vote for a president who campaigns on the promise to violate the Bill of Rights.
Imagine the constitution shredding she'll do if actually in power.
2007-03-29 07:00:23 · answer #1 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
With the Democratic Party and their war profiteering the good Democrats are not interested in being the image of the Democratic Party in 2008. Would you want to be running for President for a party that has an Iraq War Bill with $20 billion in wasteful spending. When the Democratic Party has war bills that fund things like $74 million for peanut storage, $124 million for the shrimp industry and $25 million for spinach producers how could someone with values put their face alongside the Democratic Party.
2007-03-29 14:38:10 · answer #2 · answered by George G 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We have very viable candidates ---- it's the repugs that can't seem to come up with a viable one! Of the frontrunners:
McCain -- Like the guy, but way too old and he's lost his appeal to many
Guliani -- Two affairs and three marrriages
If they were smart and logical, they'd put their money on Hagel....he has the most appeal to both sides, not just the republicans.
2007-03-31 13:16:08 · answer #3 · answered by JoJo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The republicans have a cross dressing socialist, and a deranged, shell shocked lunatic who contradicts himself in the same sentence.
No I'm not a democrat, I'm stating the truth. I agree with your above statements. But the other side isn't offering anything either.
Rudy is For gun control. FOR abortion FOR stem cell research FOR big government. He is for everything republicans have been against for years. and yet they claim he is some kind of hero for going to funerals after 9/11. Or is it because he was running around Manhattan telling the press, " We don't know any details at the moment"
Give me a break, It's a set up. The money men in New york have already bought the next president and it's "Police state Rudy"
2007-03-29 14:07:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
How come the republicans don't have any viable candidates? The top two are both adulterers that won't be elected because the majority of the nation cares too much about morals.
2007-03-29 16:20:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is the Democrat Party dead? Man that would be nice!
2007-03-29 14:03:01 · answer #6 · answered by Sane 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They just don't make good democrats like they did back in JFK's day. Tis a shame.
2007-03-29 15:41:10 · answer #7 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, unfortunately those are the only candidates that political correctness will allow. the dissolving of both parties would be nice, maybe people would begin to think for themselves
2007-03-29 14:04:41 · answer #8 · answered by nuff 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm no fan of Democrats and liberals but let's leave the petty name calling to them.
2007-03-29 14:59:15 · answer #9 · answered by GMP 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The candidates you see are the best they have to offer. Draw your own conclusions.
2007-03-29 16:51:07 · answer #10 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋