The money comes from many sources. Wealthy muslims donate to the cause. Governments finance some of the most dangerous aspects of this hate cult(Iran=hezbollah)(Saudi=madrases schools) Criminal enterprises operated world wide also provides some cash, and of course lets not forget the money collected in the western world for the so called muslim charities. It would help if people stopped using the term "radical islamic" by their measure there is nothing radical about them. These people are correctly practicing islam as put forth by the imams and taught by the koran.
2007-03-29 06:59:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
America ( I heard Bush gave Pakistani Dictator Musharaf $4 bn ) supports military regimes, and they funnel some money into jehadi coffers ( Remember taliban was created by CIA?),
Oil rich saudis,
Donations from Western muslims
2007-03-29 07:09:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by shrek 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Partly from the surge in opium and heroin production in Afghanistan since that war began.
Mainly from the 9 billion in cash the Bush adminstiration has lost in Iraq since 03.
2007-03-29 06:54:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
They run some legitimate businesses (obl ran honey producing businesses) and illegal businesses (heroin production and drug running).
They also run many scams (selling black market cigarettes, coupon scams, identity theft, just plain theft, etc.)
They also get a lot of funding from governments and sympathetic businesses, because islam has some form of banking that doesn't lend at interest, so a lot of the transactions are cash from place-to-place.
2007-03-29 06:55:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well before, Saddam was giving them money to blow themselves up. No wait, that was the palestinians.
Have you ever donated money to a group you knew nothing about? I did once until I asked who they were and what it was for. I stopped donating that very day and to this date, I haven't given a penny to anyone begging for my support.
2007-03-29 08:01:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kevin A 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
some of their money comes from criminal activities. they are involved in the sale of narcotics around the world. Afghanistan does grow a lot of poppies. they are also heavy into the sale of marijuana here in the USA. think of it the next time some one asks you to light up a joint
2007-03-29 07:25:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by happygael 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
State sponsors of terror. (which we need to start destroying one by one) Except different than Iraq. We need to bomb and move on and let others worry about how they are going to rebuild. If I had my way wed be doing air strikes on Irans nuclear, weapons, and naval facilities as we speak for providing Iraqi insurgents with weapons.
2007-03-29 07:07:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The same place every other radical terrorist gets their money. Or for that matter, how most governments get their money.
From people who support their cause, and from semi-legal activities (fund-raisers).
2007-03-29 06:54:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
They are supported by other groups, and use their natural resources and sell things, like the rest of us. And I believe it is our gravest reason for staying in Iraq--to keep Iran from gaining control of Iraqi oil, and to keep them from slaughtering Iraqis to get it.
And in a way, JGF is factually correct. I have seen Liberals on here who think we should be at war with Saudi Arabia. I think it fortunate they are not making diplomatic decisions, personally.
2007-03-29 06:55:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Ofcourse he will react by technique of going after them; purely this time with genuine stated intentions of going after them; no longer utilising their assaults as a pretext to salary extra adventures international huge. Obama also receives to the muse reason behind the problem that is our overseas coverage that has contributed to the radicalization of a few muslims. do not forget that an outstanding form of the terrorist which have attacked us are from Saudi Arabia; a kingdom that our presidents previous have called our large best chum. the purely genuine best chum we've there is the corrupt king, and not the conventional Saudis. If the conventional Saudis had their chance they could line us all up and shoot us with guns. that is because of our overseas coverage of helping the King's oppresive reign and the existence of our military bases of their holy land. in case you opt for to resign the radicalization then you really could manage the muse reason behind the region. in case you do not then you really will consistently see the infinite cycle of bloodshed after bloodshed.
2016-12-02 23:40:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋