2007-03-29 05:58:51 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
After reviewing your answers, I have drawn a narrow vision of the total picture. We are absolutely crazy if we continue sitting here listening to so many that are addicted to Kool-Aid !!! Their 6Th Grade teacher told them all about those nasty Patriots, Republicans, and Christians. Thank God He gave us George, can you possibly imagine if Hillary or Kerry, or that Environmental Hypocrite Gore was there during all these situations. Costa Rica looks real goood !! God Bless America !! ( I finally figured out the reason they hate George so much, he is ALL the three they hate ) WOW.
2007-03-29 14:17:09 · answer #1 · answered by fuzzypetshop 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Last I checked.
The US was attacked on 9/11. American military were sent in force into Afghanistan, and managed to destroy most of the Taliban. Bin Laden was never captured and Saddam is still in power, but Iraq isn't attacking anyone, so we're ignoring them.
Iran still has the progressive western-friendly govt they had prior to 2005, and supports US efforts to destroy terrorists in the region. There is no Gitmo detention facility, and the provions of the Patriot Act were allowed to expire in 2006 rather than being renewed.
It's still a Republican-controlled Congress, but it has roughly the same balance as it did during the 1990s.
Our total debt is 6.2 trillion, rather than 8.9 trillion, with most of the increase arising because of subsidies given to businesses to make them more environmentally friendly.
2007-03-29 13:03:30 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We still get attacked on 9/11, same exact way because there was no way to prevent such a catastrophy. And Al Gore still invades afganistan like bush did because it was what needed to be done. And without manipulating the people (like bush did) Al Gore seeked the opinions of others and took them into careful consideration before invading any other middle eastern country (like iraq). He ended up listening to the worlds fears and took the war on terror one step at a time instead of worrying about his legacy of being a big spreader of democracy. Saddam is still in power and is still just as rediculous a leader as the president of Iran, but there is full fledge democracy in afganastan now. Osama still has not been caught, but since a majory of the funds, man power, and effort for the war are going to afganastan, the people are beginning to reject osama's influence over their land. Iraq and Iran are still pumping money for terrorism into afganistan, but now Iran and Iraq have serious sanctions and the world is rejecting to do any business with either of them. Saddam is still in power and we are verbally fighting with him like we are with Iran and North Korea, but it hasn't escalated past words yet. So our military power can still focus on afganistan for now. Once we have the afgans people stabilized, will wait for another one of the middle eastern countries to screw up and then will invade and "correct" them. And it will be an easier endevor because since afganastan went so well, we have so much more support world wide. Finally Iraq screws up and we catch them plotting an attack on US soil. Iran's president sees how the entire world is backing america in stomping out iraq and saddam that the Iranian president shits his pants and steps off america's toes. With the world behind us, winning the peace in iraq is easier than previously expected. By now we are still fighting rebel terror forces, but they are scarce. And the whole beauty of becoming a terrorist against the USA hasn't caught on worldwide since support for the US led invasion of iraq was so widely supported. bla bla bla...in general....things are sort of the same, but people are happier, the world likes us more, less people died, and less money has been wasted. Oh and republicans are still complaining about how a republican in the white house would have been so much better....lol.
2007-03-29 13:24:53 · answer #3 · answered by World Expert 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The official language of the United States would be arabic and we'd paying royalties to Iraq for the privledge of speaking Sadam's language. But hey, we'd have countered this with carbon offsets for our mansions! That's good and responsible right?!?!
2007-03-29 13:05:32 · answer #4 · answered by kmg3798 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The politicians drive Hummers and fly in private jets, but laws require the rest of us to drive golf carts.
2007-03-29 13:01:57 · answer #5 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You tell me, since you apparently have some ability to see a "parallel universe" that no one else has.
2007-03-29 13:01:47 · answer #6 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Sep 11 attacks were prevented.
Over 6,000 American civilians and soldiers were never killed.
2007-03-29 13:02:26 · answer #7 · answered by Darth Vader 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ask one of those "selected, not elected" freaks. They're not in contact with this reality.
2007-03-29 13:18:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
look dum aaasss
global warming IS HERE TO STAY
regardless if GORE FLIES ON THE SPACE SHUTTLE
get over it GET A CLUE
2007-03-29 13:03:45 · answer #9 · answered by baldheadrove 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
TENS OF THOUSANDS LESS men, women, and children --- soldiers and civilians alike --- dead and maimed from an illegal war; THAT'S what it looks like!
2007-03-29 13:03:51 · answer #10 · answered by backinbowl 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋