English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

Any time is a bad time to have a democrat controlled congress.

2007-03-29 07:05:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Dangerous radicals have controlled Iran since they were elected in 1989 (Ayatollah Khamenei) and 2005 (Ahmadinejad).

Let's ignore that fact that, if we claim to value democracy, we should support them solely because they were elected by their people.

The current regime in Iran has been in place for almost 2 years. And was elected largely in response to the US agression in the region, since there are US forces on both sides of Iran. So, whether we like it or not, it's largely a response to what we've done the past several years.

2007-03-29 05:50:21 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 1

This is exactly what is wrong with the present administration, trying to fix the problems of their countries instead of focusing on the present problems within the United States. Think how much better the U.S. would be for the its people if instead of funneling all that money for the war in Iraq and possible war in Iran, spent here at home to fix our own infrastructures, schools, medical insurances, etc. Of course, that is not in the better interest of the Republicans, as their main goal for the people of the United States is to have two economic classes, the very poor and the very rich.

2007-03-29 06:22:04 · answer #3 · answered by furrryyy 5 · 0 2

you do no longer see a lot information approximately Iraq anymore. No information is stable information via fact the media won't record stable information from Iraq. I in simple terms discovered that there is a college going up in Northern Iraq. So, see, the Democratic Congress did do something stable - you do no longer ought to hearken to undesirable information from Iraq 24/7.

2016-11-24 21:32:04 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Very dangerous! I'd like to know how in the hell, if Hilary gets elected, she can possibly deal with muslim radicals in Iran, when they see women as beneath them!

2007-03-29 05:49:20 · answer #5 · answered by Bunz 5 · 1 0

I hope the Democrats have a plan for addressing why they were reactive and not proactive in the conflict.

2007-03-29 05:50:28 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 2 0

If radicals control Iran, why did you attack a secular nation that executed radical Muslims in Iraq? And eliminate Iran's biggest enemy, Saddam?


DOH!!!!!

2007-03-29 05:50:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

the dangerous radicals are in the white house

2007-03-29 05:51:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Oh, I don't know, we can always get more Hilarys, etc to agree with the next war and the deny later that they were for it.

2007-03-29 05:56:30 · answer #9 · answered by Barry W 2 · 2 0

Exactly. So go give all those morons who voted for the Democraps a pimpslap.

2007-03-29 05:48:26 · answer #10 · answered by Sane 6 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers