English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6,000 years ago when the world was made... Seems like they need different weather, but their bones are found in the same places.

2007-03-29 04:04:33 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Zoology

Please only reply if you are intelligent and educated, so we don't have to waste our time with nonsense about "evolution" and the earth being millions of years old .

2007-03-29 04:28:55 · update #1

14 answers

i dont want to waste your time with an explanation, so here it is, NO

2007-03-29 04:31:28 · answer #1 · answered by Nick C 3 · 1 1

Yes but the mammoths found preserved lived later than than the fossilised dinosaurs.
The dinosaurs were mostly wiped out during The Flood 4,350 years ago apart from those on The Ark and most of the mammoths were drowned and buried too and giant bones fossils are found showing this though the mammoths are labelled prehistoric to fit with Planet of Apes scenarios.
Then after Noah let the mammoths off the Ark they proliferated into great herds.
As the Ice Age built up ice at the poles the Earth tilted and caused more tidal waves/tsunamis to destroy and bury the mammoths in muck.

2016-12-16 13:24:43 · answer #2 · answered by Rose 2 · 0 4

1

2016-12-23 21:34:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Basically, the earth was formed way more than 6000 y.ago. paw. First habitants were bacterias, much later the dinosaurs at about 65 million y.ago, then Mammoths came with the Ice Age about 10 million y.ago, so It's merely impossible that millions of scientists would be wrong when examining bones, rocks formations and even petroleum and the time taken for those simple elements in nature to be formed. Sorry to burst you bubble.
Now if you consider all these scientists wrong, tell me what are your credencials on the subject and why your theory deserves credit. Please consider that the Bible was written about 2000 years ago and is based on popular stories which passed hand to hand and distorted, and there are no consistent proof what so ever, that they really happened. Also remember a theory has to have proven facts to become reliable "history". Ex. Dinosaurs, DNA testing, etc
It's cute that you believe in your god but it doesn't mean he is real.

2016-05-12 09:15:23 · answer #4 · answered by zuzu 2 · 1 0

For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/axAZz

Dinosaurs were said to have gone extinct at the end of the cretaceous period, 65 millions of years ago. As you mentioned, certain creatures from that era did survive. One of those "dinosaurs" is know to have survived to this very day: taxonomists. Taxonomists are considered to be modern birds that are direct descendants of theropod dinosaurs, such as the Tyrannosaurus-Rex. And to answer the woolly mammoth question; No, the woolly mammoth was not a dinosaur rather, it is a an extinct prehistoric relative of the modern day elephant. in addition, they were one of the first mammals to appear on the face of the earth.

2016-04-05 06:12:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No!
Woolly mammoths were giant mammals and ancient relatives of the modern elephants, of which there are only 2 extant species. Woolly mammoths evolved during the Pleistocene (1.8 million to ~10,000 years ago) and were extant until about 3 thousand years ago. They were probably extirpated by prehistoric humans.

The "Age of the Dinosaurs" ended about 65 million years ago, according to the extensive fossil record and scientific dating processes. At that time, mammals were very small creatures, a fact that probably enabled them to survive the catstrophic event that created global climate change and led to the demise of the giant dinasaurs that roamed the earth for millions of years.

2007-03-29 07:05:15 · answer #6 · answered by Doc Sea 2 · 1 0

No, wooly mammoths lived during the ice ages (the last one ended about 12,000 years ago. Most of the dinosaurs died off even before that (long before most mammals evolved) about 60 million years ago. There bones may be found in the same location, but not on the same layers of earth.

2007-03-29 04:08:43 · answer #7 · answered by kt 7 · 0 0

Where Did Mammoths Live

2016-11-14 08:31:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, they did not live together. They may be found in the same location but not at the same depth. Depth = time.

I'll just ignore the 6000 years, because if God created the stars and sun on day five, what was the time scale for days 1-4, My belief is a day is translated to millions of years.

2007-03-29 04:35:58 · answer #9 · answered by Grant d 4 · 2 0

Mammoths are mammalian,...they represent the apex of mammal evoluton...sorta....the dinosaurs were reptilian for the most part..there global environment was very much different than the environments that became conducive to the proliferation of mammals.

And co-incidentally...a 6000 year old 'earth-habituate' ideology is SO archaically 'dark-ages' mentality that any answer to your question becomes an exercise in frustration.

2007-03-29 04:28:30 · answer #10 · answered by olddogwatchin 5 · 0 0

Their bones are found in the same places? Where did you read that?
Woolly mammoths lived tens of millions of years after the dinosaurs became extinct.
Supplemental: Seeing your additional details, I propose you post the question in "Religion&Spirituality".

2007-03-29 04:10:14 · answer #11 · answered by Dr. Zaius 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers