What is the oldest Royal Bloodline in history?
Some royal families today can trace their ancestry for hundreds of years. However, some families of Ireland that share heritage of the "cuilleain", the "Divine Holly Ones", the first Druids, the first priest kings of humanity are over 5,000 years old and still exist today. The Holly Tree is named after them, so is the word "holy".
See:
http://ucadia.com/frank/frank_name.htm
and
http://ucadia.com/frank/frank_history_stonehenge.htm
So who are the oldest royal bloodline(s) of human history and can any of them trace their heritage back to the same age as the cuilleain over 5,000 years ago?
2007-03-29
01:28:31
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Royalty
The Japanese royal family claims direct lineage going back over 2600 years, and can be definitely linked to Emperor Ōjin, who ruled around 300 AD.
2007-03-29 09:29:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by JerH1 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Royal Bloodlines Family History
2016-12-12 09:24:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's quite possibly the British Royal Family because even before William the Conqueror in 1066, Great Britain had a bunch of tribal monarchies through the land. So Great Britain from the start was meant to always be ruled by a monarch. Sorry anti monarchists :)
2007-03-29 02:59:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
1. Royal Bloodline of Jesus Christ has a two-word name: the Holy Trinity! But every century or so, people propose a secular bloodline, that claims certain members of Europe's royal families are descendents, humanly speaking, of Jesus Christ. Such a bloodline, of course, requires that Jesus was married, and that He left at least one offspring. This heresy claims that He was married to Mary Magdalene. The latest version of the Royal Bloodline is now with us!
The proponents of this Bloodline encourage us to believe that it has recently been discovered, and contains new information! However, scholars who study early church history, and the history of the Bible, tell us that this Bloodline's claims and the information that supports them have been proposed from time to time since the days of the early church. The claims have been disproven and rejected each time they have turned up! They are not the latest and greatest; they are the same-old same-old!
but is better if you go on:http://www.royalty.nu/history/genealogy.html
at least you can find more things..good luck
2007-03-29 01:34:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by sauvage 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Of the major European royal houses, I'm going for the French, and the descendants of the House of Capet. I believe they originated around the 987BC mark. French royalists all claim descendancy from this House in some form or another. So we've touched on over 1000 years there.
2007-03-29 01:57:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think your dates are a bit off. The Celts didn't get to Ireland until around 1000-500 BCE, so they, and their Druids, couldn't have had anything to do with Stonehenge.
2007-03-29 03:55:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by ArcadianStormcrow 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Africanus, Asian,European, Indian or Arabic, those are the five that I can conclude stuff starts at, where they came from, I have no idea. One is as royal as others say or agree that they are. Humans are funny mammals.
2007-03-29 01:44:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The longest is the british royal family, its the longest proveable bloodline and its in the guinness book of records
2007-03-29 03:45:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Blue 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I believe it belongs to the descendants of the ancient Egyptians, a bloodline which extends for more than 15,000 years.
2007-03-29 01:54:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Marcus Ariel 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I belive it was either the Japanese or Chinese Royal Family.
2007-03-31 03:28:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋