Tony Blair said Sunday that the 15 British sailors and marines captured by Iran were not in Iranian waters and warned that Britain viewed their fate as a "fundamental" issue....but iranians said that britons were in iranian waters when they were captured.... who tell the truth?!! whats your opinion?
plz say your nationality..
2007-03-29 00:49:37 · 12 answers · asked by White Man 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Does it matter? Only an inherently evil country would kidnap people like this. Most countries would just brush them away. When are you people going to wake up to the threat?
2007-03-29 01:00:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
For the sake of the captured soldiers, anyones opinion is irrelevant. Facts are the only true option on their side. If the fact is they were not in Iranian waters then Iran has to release them asap. If they indeed were in those waters then Britain needs to explain why.
2007-03-29 08:05:33 · answer #2 · answered by Charlooch 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The American news stations are reporting that the ship was in Iraqi waters. But I have learned not to necessarily believe all I read or see or hear...unless it is first hand. As a Canadian, I have an avid interest in American politics...but the American media is just a joke. I am not suggesting that we are necessarily getting false reports on this account, but I also am not jumping on the bandwagon that says they were in Iraqi waters. Time will tell...
2007-03-29 07:58:47 · answer #3 · answered by Super Ruper 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Afghanistan govt was not afraid of Bush either. so much for them! Iran is run by an idiot trying his best to start another war. The Brits were in Iraqi waters.
2007-03-29 07:58:57 · answer #4 · answered by Gina P 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Iraqi waters.
What does my nationality have to do with the answer?
Iran is obviously scared of cowboy Bush or they would of taken American soldiers hostage (which is what the situation really amounts to). They choose Britain because they know if they take US military personnel, cowboy Bush would go after them.
2007-03-29 07:52:41 · answer #5 · answered by MI 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They were in IRAQI waters .
2 ways to prove it .
1. The British have GPS records to prove where they were.
2. When the British requested that the Iranians provide grid coordinates of their location from IRANIAN records. . . . . .LMAO.. . . . . The Iranians supplied coordinates that were in IRAQI waters !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Then later changed them to show Iranian waters .. . What a LIE !!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-29 08:05:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Im American, and thew were in Iraqi waters. The Iranians are not scared of Cowboy Bush - and they are showing it to the world. Time for new leadership - the world is more dangerous.
2007-03-29 07:52:14 · answer #7 · answered by Richard O 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
If they were in IRAQI waters they would have nuked Iran by now! If they were in iraqi waters they would have released the satellite photos and started making their case. Since they have done neither you know they were where they had no right to be!
2007-03-29 08:15:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I am a proud American Soldier.
And it dont matter to me where they were, this is a act of war from Iran and should be delt with appropriately.
It is a very fundamental issue.
2007-03-29 07:57:53 · answer #9 · answered by Jon B 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
All military, merchant, and most large pleasure boats have GPS systems. This confrontation is not really about crossing boundary lines. That could easily be proven. It's about Islamic bullies.
-from a proud American with British & German ancestry
2007-03-29 08:08:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋