English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Kane dominates Triple H and Flair singlehandedly until Orton finnaly finshes the job! The mask should have stayed and the belt should have been his!
http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/kane/video/x7akz_wwe-triple-h-vs-kane-kane-mask-off

2007-03-28 18:41:35 · 9 answers · asked by Jayson Kane 7 in Sports Wrestling

9 answers

Here are 12 I've come up with off the top of my head, and are in no real order. For every one we come up with, there are most likely 10 more...

*The fact that Davey Boy Smith never won a World Title.
*The fact that Scott Hall (much more talented than Kev Nash) never won a World title.
*That Kane has not had a long run with the World Title, despite having numerous title shots, and being over from October 1997- Novermber 1999.
*Austin being accidentally injured by Own Hart, therefore shortening his own career.
*Losing Owen Hart before his time (I still get emotional thinking about this, as he was one of my favourites).
*Superstar Billy Graham never wrestling Hogan in the 1980's.
*Brock Lesnar never facing Triple H.
*That Eddie never lived long enough to get another World title run (he was booked to beat Batista just before he passed away. Batista was deeply affected by it, as he had developed a bond with Eddie).
*Seeing the Hardcore division ruined and made a joke of by the 24/7 rule (Although RVD and Jeff Hardy did go some way to redeedming it).
*That WWE doesn't really seem intent on hiring women to wrestle, or who can wrestle proficiently, but that they seem to be booked mainly as objects.
*That Hogan and Austin never faced off (if they can put personal differences to one side, this one may well still happen at a future WtrestleMania).
*Linking in with Owen - that so many guys who worked in WWF/WWE down the years have died years before their time.

Thanks for the question.

2007-03-29 00:12:09 · answer #1 · answered by Oneirokritis 5 · 1 0

He should have had the belt for more than 1 day, Taker's had the belt 4 times in his career, and Kane has been a dominating force in the WWE for a long time, I think wether Cena keeps the belt (which I hope to God that doesn't happen) or HBK wins it, they should fued with Kane for the title and then let him have it.

2007-03-28 22:23:23 · answer #2 · answered by revman_237 4 · 1 0

Kane has gotten screwed more times than any wrestler recently. HHH losing the title to Batista. Let The Undertaker win the title at WM23 and let Kane win ansd keep the title for more than 1 week.

2007-03-28 19:02:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yeah kane and undertaker usually get screwed i would like to see them both hold the belt for a long time at some point everytime either one of them ownes it its for like a wek or less in kanes situation. btw taker taking the belt at wm23

2007-03-28 18:45:53 · answer #4 · answered by Nicky james 4 · 1 0

Yes. Kane was better with the mask.

2007-03-28 19:26:47 · answer #5 · answered by KISS Fan 7 · 0 0

I would say Kane he deseve to hold onto the title for more that 1 day.

2007-03-28 18:47:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The WCW Invasion.

2007-03-28 20:53:34 · answer #7 · answered by no more heroes 2001 5 · 0 0

kane is my favourite wrestler and has been in the wwe. and what does he get for this... getting SCREWED OVER AND OVER AGAIN. this is bullshit. kane deserves better

2007-03-29 06:09:59 · answer #8 · answered by 3 · 0 0

yea he got screwed and they made a bigger monster out of him then he was before

2007-03-28 19:23:32 · answer #9 · answered by nWoMATT 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers