Does The Veto Of A Few Countries Undermine The United Nations?

Question

I have always thought the veto power of the few nations undermined the intended democratic nature of the United Nations. Since the UN's inception, the all-powerful Security Council has been a ideological battleground for (chiefly) USA VS USSR political conflict. This infected virtually every general assembly-democratically-enacted attempt by other member states to provide aid, reasonable intervention, justice, human rights or any UNITED efforts to solve whatever problems plagued member states, be they natural disaster, internal discord, international conflict (war), epidemic disease etc.... For example the UN has, for decades, by democratic vote condemned Israel many times and the USA, virtually alone by Israel, has vetoed every such legislation. I believe that abolishing the Security Council and veto power of the few would revolutionize the UN over-night and it would become truly united, effective and democratic.

Answer 1

The UN is an irrelevant organization that we have too long pandered to. I personally don't value the edicts of any structure that is supported by murdering dictators.

Answer 2

The U.N. was founded by NATO. Obviously, it has been a tool of the U.S. since day one. However, as the U.S. loses greater and greater credibility with the world, and as the U.S. financial contribution is diminished by the increasing contributions of other nations, and as the Republican Congress has withheld funding of the U.N. for political reasons, it becomes more necessary to change the Security Council voting to, say, a 70% affirmative vote, rather than one member veto power. If the Israelis can steal all of Palestine and slowly exterminate the Palestinians without a condemnation or sanctions by the U.N., then that organization is pointless and lacking in integrity.

Answer 3

The formula for organizing the United Nations is certainly something that needs to be reorganized and rethought. But there is no easy solution. The only thing I have thought might improve the situation of organization in the UN is a move toward Federalism like the organizing polices and principles of the Western Civilization, a parliamentary or Presidential system of divided government authority organized with extreme care and decentralization of power which is built in to the new UN with plenty of safety systems to insure that no one or small group of Nations could dominate the UN. in the future.

Answer 4

it fairly is a relic of the chilly conflict. They gave those 5 international locations vetoes by using fact they have been the (maximum renowned) triumphant powers in WW2 yet via the 60's they have been additionally the 5 nuclear powers (previous to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty) so it exchange into sensible to maintain the present format as they figured that no longer something too unpalatable to a nuclear ability ought to bypass the physique lest it galvanize a nuclear conflict. i think of in case you gave UN risk-free practices Council vetoes (word that for different deliberative our bodies of the UN like the final assembly no united states has a veto) to much extra international locations you may could purely assure that no longer something ever passes and make the Council that much less proper, yet because it fairly is its especially uncommon to get something extra desirable than a assertion condemning something and in step with danger some financial sanctions by way of it besides so the thought something proper to Israel can purely be vetoed isn't probably that massive a deal - functionally its purely like the Council does not exist.

Answer 5

The UN is a totally ineffective organization, that no country in the world pays attention to. None. Look at Iran, The UN says no to nuclear weapons and Iran says kiss off. What is being done? Until they back their words with serious action it is no more than a holding ground for mid level politicians wanting something on their resume

Answer 6

The only way the United Nations can work is if the great powers want it to work. If you take away their veto power, they will be less likely to participate.

I think MORE countries need a veto power - Brazil, Germany, Japan, and India.

Answer 7

the UN is a joke... they should do away with it...we would be a lot better off...

I'll give you two examples...

Rwanda.. and the attempted Timor...

they have no power.. give people false security and then abandon them... final outcome is slaughter...