"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier.. .just as long as I'm the dictator..."
;-)
2007-03-28 18:38:30 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
We won't use torture.. We'll use 'reasonable pressure'.. And instead of calling them concentration camps, let's call them FEMA detention centres.
2007-03-28 18:41:59 · update #1
First the poor, then the liberals, then the abortionists, then the gays, then the coloured? Sound good?
2007-03-28 18:45:46 · update #2
Sorry think 1st- Couldn't help myself.. XD
2007-03-28 18:48:31 · update #3
Sounds good to me, hell lets do it LOL
I'm with ya brother, make it sound more appealing all the time :)
2007-03-28 18:41:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
You have a lot of good ideas, but I think they might catch on.
I think we should out Liberal the Liberals. Here's how:
Ban guns, only "the militia" (that's us) can have them.
Supress free speech under the guise of politcal correctness.
Ban smoking, but legalize drugs. Then offer to "help" them by sending them to "rehab."
No reasonable pressure needed. Just guilt them into submission by pointing out what homophobic racists they are.
Lastly, free access to abortion. Maybe they'll just stop reproducing.
2007-03-28 19:15:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Sieg Heil,Meinem Fuhrer!
2007-03-28 18:42:09 · answer #3 · answered by craig 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
No, let the Liberals grow up, pay taxes, learn something about life and responsibility and they'll change. Oh yeah, thats how it works now......
2007-03-28 18:48:04 · answer #4 · answered by Partisanshipsux 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
could you imagine what a dull boring place America would be ....but not in the camps we would be having a blast away from all those stick up the ***'s cons...whooo hooo thats a great idea
2007-03-28 18:44:29 · answer #5 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
No. I just ignore those I don't agree with. And laugh on the inside.
2007-03-28 19:17:14 · answer #6 · answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I understand this to be sarcastic....BUT!
We would all be better off if we could discuss things rationally. This type of Q&A serves no purpose. Why not ask intelligent questions?
2007-03-28 18:47:03 · answer #7 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I've got something for your neo-con asz if you even try........
I heard cry-baby George make that statement........ Be careful what you try........ you just might reach out and pull back a stub....
2007-03-28 18:48:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Here's a tip to improve your acting: NeoCons don't invent names to make them sound like something more than they are, like "vertically challenged" instead of "short", for example.
And no. They aren't as narrow-minded as people say they are.
2007-03-28 18:48:03 · answer #9 · answered by Picard Facepalm 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Our men, and now women have fought and died for their freedom to actually verbalize their stupidity and it should never be silenced no matter how stupid they sound.
2007-03-28 18:43:38 · answer #10 · answered by Kye H 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Soounds like a great idea to me.
2007-03-28 18:56:27 · answer #11 · answered by Tenn Gal 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋