Does WWE compare to WWF?

Question

Come on man. WWF was maybe the most insane thing ever on tv. Steroided out coke heads in crazy costumes, not nearly limber enough to do the acrobatics they do now. What do you think?

Answer 1

Only thing I miss about the WWF is the tradition they carried for pro wrestling, and the Attitude era, WWE emobdies none of that. They let some crap pro body builder reject like John Cena carry around a joke of a WWE Championship belt and say he's the best just to make Vinnie Mac some cash. TNA at least keeps with tradition of what wrestling should be.

Answer 2

WWF much better than WWE, there is no storyline in WWE.. its really just a bunch of yelling and arguing ... what happened to the juicy stuff, no crazy tag team costumes or actually tag teams like there were in WWF ... what happened to the Dudley's, Too Cool, Rock n Sock Connection?, no wrestling superstar that can electrify the crowd unlike back with the WWF. Someone tell me how its possible for a crowd of thousands to get more excited about a talk from the Rock on a screen then the main event that evening? Goes to show that the superstars back in WWF are much better than the WWE superstars ... but its only an opnion.

Answer 3

WWE has a these stupid gimmicks and mainly focuses around what Jerry "the King" Lawler says, the "puppies". WWF had wrestler like Owen and Bret Hart, Chyna, The Rock, and others. If you didn't know Chris Masters is taking steriods. It was a special on youtube aout the guys from WWF and WWE taking riods like Hulk Hogan and Jesse Vennture. Others guys on the show said they personally injected Hulk Hogan in the butt many times and said Vince McMahon knew.

Answer 4

The crowd went literally insane when The Rock came up on screen. I know, I was there and I was one of the many on their feet. I miss the old WWF Attitude days. The storylines then were so much better than they are now.

Answer 5

Well the WWF was sure more exciting and unpredictable so I agree but if people like The Rock, Mankind, Mick Foley, Cactus Jack and many others returned then maybe WWE could be just as good.

Answer 6

Actually the acrobatics started in the Nineties when it was still WWF. I liked the attitude era better. Spencer UFC TNA and WSX get worse ratings then WWE. What are you smoking?

Answer 7

Its the same company! Altho when they had the WWF name it was alot better. They had alot of kick *** classic wrestlers. the thing is alot of them are retired from wrestleing or just moved on to other things or they got hurt like Steve austin. So yeah wwe i think will go threw alot of wrestlers and will eventually gain a kick *** wrestler here and there. ANd another difference When it was wwf People like Austin did alot of cool ****! lol like when he blew up the DX express and and when he lifted Triple H wayin the air in a car and droped him stuff like that! But alot of those good classic wrestlers are getting old so Vince Mcmahon has alot of work to do!

Answer 8

WWF extra human beings respected it via F= Federation now human beings in simple terms take E=leisure as a humorous tale. the full concept replaced into extra suitable and it didnt have a PG score. the female wrestlers easily regarded like wrestlers they have been geared up and in simple terms as stable via fact the adult males, now WWE basically has some females like that. The storylines have been astonishing yet they werent the main concentration. i replaced into around for the tail end of WWF yet I wish I had considered extra like my brother. the only way I see it now's thru flashbacks and DVD's and youtube. i wish sooner or later the WWE can return to the way it replaced into.

Answer 9

WWE would still be WWF if the World Wildlife Fund wouldn't have sued Vince.

Answer 10

you all say that the old wwf was better. yet wwes pay per view buys are at an alltime high? i say wwe is better allthough i do miss the attitude era