A woman in her late 40’s was handed a sentence of 2 years in prison for extorting money from mentally challenged man at a hotel they both worked at. She said horrific things to him to get money from the poor guy. To make things worst, he gave up his collection of coins in order to get green papers that are fortune. This went on for few years until that pathetic woman left a threatening message on the answering machine. The parents of the man heard it and phone the police about what was happening to their son at his job.
From what was heard at the court, she told the man with the disability that he got her pregnant by letting her touch his private area with her hands. From there, she manipulate the man with terror to give her money or he will go to prison for rape as well as other consequences that could ruin his life forever.
I am happy to say that woman is going to prison, but I wish her sentences were more than 3 years. Say 30 years or more (LOL). I don’t feel sorry for thi
2007-03-28 16:29:27 · 8 answers · asked by spejl 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
I wish she got more time as well. But it was a non violent crime and may be he first offense.
2007-03-28 16:33:12 · answer #1 · answered by shadouse 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that if she got only two years, it was due to what could actually be proved, rather than what she really did. It's unfortunately difficult to get reliable testimony from mentally challenged individuals.
In any case, for doing what she did, it's possible that the two years she did get will be less than pleasant. It's also certain that it will be more difficult for her to get a job when she gets out.
People are really sick.
2007-03-28 16:34:02 · answer #2 · answered by Deirdre H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of its honest and that i think of he's accomplished its no longer unavoidably real that his crime became worse than vick's or stallworths, its extra this is a trouble-free crime that desires to be stopped... the extra trouble-free the situation, the extra it desires to be punished to end people from doing it there arent many people working dogs combating earrings obtainable, so even in spite of the undeniable fact that the crime might look worse, they are thinking there arent many ppl that are going to income a lesson from vick being in reformatory for 2 years on the different hand, whilst somebody contains a gun illegaly "for secure practices" and is going to reformatory for 2 years, they are hoping plenty extra people will learn a lesson from that and not do it as for stallworth, i disagree with the quantity of time he have been given, yet im specific the state he committed it in made a great distinction and im assuming additionally they felt the gun rules wwere had to income stricter because of the fact it is extra of a trouble-free subject and im giants fan so I even have been and continually would be a burress fan yet i think of he deserved what he have been given
2016-12-15 10:57:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
sounds like a good civil case should be in her future after she gets out of prison!!! she should pay back the money she took plus pay damages!!!
2007-03-28 16:34:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they should have locked her away and thrown away the key. What a pathetic human being she is. God bless****
2007-03-28 16:37:37 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea i say 10 years sounds good
2007-03-28 16:33:11 · answer #6 · answered by mlkirchgessner 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
she should have gotten more time. Sounds like she did a horrible thing.
2007-03-28 16:33:42 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I cant stress it enough! - WHAT COMES AROUND GOES AROUND! her day will come !
2007-03-28 16:33:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋